Legal Partners
DashboardActivate Briefly
Legal Intelligence · Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Litigation & Dispute Resolutionlegal & regulatory updates

Briefly tracks litigation & dispute resolution developments — court rulings, legislation, gazette notices, and regulatory updates — from courts and regulators. 60 updates tracked in the past 30 days, last updated 6 Sept.

Get Litigation & Dispute Resolution updates in your inbox
Legal News
United States
Case Law

Guam court denies teens’ request to move luxury car theft case to juvenile court

A Guam judge has denied a request by two 16-year-old defendants to transfer their felony auto theft cases to juvenile court, ruling that their extensive history of delinquency outweighs their youth.In a decision filed September 6, 2019, Presiding Judge Alberto C. Lamorena III of the Superior Court of Guam ordered that Iverson Chewek and Minson

6 Sept
Uganda
Case Law

Uganda High Court Orders Smart Protus Magara to Refund $135,000 in D9 Ponzi Scheme

Smart Protus Magara has been ordered by the Civil Division of the High Court to refund over $135,000 to two Tanzanian nationals who lost money in the D9 Investment Club Ponzi scheme. The court found Magara personally liable for the losses. The legal significance of this ruling lies in its potential impact on individuals involved in similar schemes. Practitioners should note that this decision may set a precedent for holding individuals accountable for their roles in Ponzi schemes, rather than just the companies themselves. In terms of legal context, the case is relevant to the Financial Institutions Act and the Investment Schemes Act, which regulate financial institutions and investment schemes in Uganda. The court's ruling also highlights the importance of due diligence when investing in such schemes. The key parties involved are Smart Protus Magara, who was found personally liable for the losses, and the two Tanzanian nationals who lost money in the scheme. The Civil Division of the High Court delivered the judgment. Practitioners should monitor this case as it may have implications for future cases involving Ponzi schemes and individual liability.

2 Aug
Ghana
Case Law

Ghana Court of Appeal Acquits Sedina MASLOC CEO Over Financial Irregularities

Former MASLOC CEO Sedina Christine Tamakloe Attionu was acquitted and discharged by the Court of Appeal on July 30, 2026, overturning her earlier conviction on 78 charges related to alleged financial irregularities during her tenure from 2013 to 2017. The investigation into Attionu's activities was

2 Aug
Ghana
Case Law

Ghana High Court Convicts MASLOC Chief Sedina Tamakloe-Attionu in Absentia

Sedina Christine Tamakloe-Attionu's High Court conviction and 10-year imprisonment on a main stealing charge were overturned by the Court of Appeal on July 30, 2026, which acquitted and discharged her on all charges. The High Court proceeded with her trial in absentia after she failed to return from

2 Aug
Kenya
Case Law

Uhuru Kenyatta Turns Against William Ruto Amid 2027 Election

Kibwezi West MP Mwengi Mutuse accuses former President Uhuru Kenyatta of turning against President William Ruto. Mutuse cites past instances where Ruto supported Uhuru in electoral contests, including the 2002, 2013, and 2017 General Elections.

2 Aug
Kenya
Case Law

Kalonzo Claims Junet's Remarks Prove Gachagua Was Improperly Impeached

Kalonzo Musyoka has renewed claims that former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua was improperly impeached, citing remarks by National Assembly Majority Leader Junet Mohamed that he said raise questions about the integrity of the 2024 removal process. Speaking during a Sunday service at ACK All Saints Cathedral in Embu Town, Musyoka said Junet's recent comments amounted to an admission that some lawmakers received inducements to support Gachagua's impeachment. The legal significance of this matter lies in its potential implications for the legitimacy of the impeachment proceedings against Gachagua. If Musyoka's claims are substantiated, it could lead to a re-examination of the process and potentially even a reversal of the outcome. This would have significant consequences for Gachagua's political career and reputation. The relevant legal context in this matter is Chapter Six of the Constitution, which sets out principles of leadership and integrity. Musyoka's argument that leaders who publicly admit to accepting inducements should face accountability under this chapter is a key aspect of his claim. The impeachment proceedings against Gachagua were conducted under the provisions of Article 144 of the Constitution, which outlines the grounds for impeachment. The key parties involved in this matter are Kalonzo Musyoka, Rigathi Gachagua, and Junet Mohamed. Musyoka is a prominent politician who has been vocal about his opposition to Gachagua's impeachment, while Junet Mohamed is a senior government official who has made comments that have raised questions about the integrity of the impeachment process. Practitioners should monitor this matter closely as it could lead to significant changes in the political landscape. If Musyoka's claims are substantiated, it could lead to a re-examination of the impeachment proceedings and potentially even a reversal of the outcome. Attorneys representing clients who were involved in the impeachment process or have been affected by its outcome should be prepared to adapt their strategies accordingly.

2 Aug
Nigeria
Case Law

Nigeria: SERAP Demands Probe into ₦6.79bn Police Funds Scandal

The Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has urged President Bola Tinubu to direct the Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Mr Lateef Fagbemi, SAN, the Inspector-General of Police, Olatunji Rilwan Disu, and appropriate anti-corruption agencies to thoroughly and effectively investigate allegations that over ₦6.79 billion of public funds are missing, diverted […] The post Probe alleged ₦6.79bn police funds scandal, recover missing firearms’, SERAP tells Tinubu appeared first on Vanguard News.

2 Aug
Zambia
Case Law

Lusaka High Court: Chief Mumena Ordered to Pay K600,000 Torture Victims Compensation

The Lusaka High Court has ordered Chief Mumena and the Attorney General to jointly pay more than K600,000 to three members of one family after finding the traditional leader unlawfully detained, tortured and forced them into labour over accusations that they held court documents challenging his authority. This ruling is significant for practitioners as it highlights the consequences of violating human rights and the importance of upholding the rule of law in Zambia. The fact that Chief Mumena was found to have acted unlawfully and was ordered to pay damages sets a precedent for future cases involving allegations of torture and forced labour. The relevant statutes and regulations involved in this case include the Zambian Constitution, which guarantees the right to freedom from torture and cruel treatment, as well as the Laws of Zambia, which provide for the protection of human rights. The Lusaka High Court's ruling is also influenced by previous court decisions that have addressed similar issues. The key parties involved in this case are Chief Mumena, who was found to have acted unlawfully, and the Attorney General, who was ordered to jointly pay damages with the traditional leader. The three members of one family who were tortured and forced into labour are also significant parties, as their rights were violated by Chief Mumena's actions. Practitioners should take note of this ruling and its implications for future cases involving allegations of torture and human rights violations. Attorneys representing clients in similar situations should be aware of the potential consequences of violating human rights and the importance of upholding the rule of law in Zambia.

2 Aug
Kenya
Case Law

Kisumu High Court: Free Urology Screening for Men in Kenya

The 47-year-old teacher George Ouma, from Bondo, has been suffering from relentless pain and urinary issues for nearly two years, forcing him to make multiple trips to the bathroom each night. This situation highlights a common issue affecting many men over 40 in Kenya, who often suffer in silence due to embarrassment about their symptoms. The emotional toll of this condition can be significant, leading to feelings of helplessness and depression. In Kenya, urology check-ups are essential for men over 40, as they can help identify underlying conditions such as prostate issues or urinary tract infections. The Kenyan healthcare system has made efforts to increase awareness about the importance of regular health checks, including urology screenings. However, more needs to be done to encourage men to seek medical attention without fear of stigma or embarrassment. Practitioners should note that this case underscores the need for increased awareness and education on men's health issues in Kenya. By promoting open discussions about these topics, healthcare professionals can help reduce the stigma associated with male health problems and encourage more men to seek medical attention.

2 Aug

Litigation & Dispute Resolution coverage by jurisdiction

United StatesUgandaGhanaKenyaNigeriaZambiaMalawiNamibiaIndiaEthiopiaDR CongoMozambique

Other topics

AI GovernanceAntitrust & CompetitionBanking & FinanceBankruptcy & RestructuringCompliance & RegulatoryContracts & CommercialCorporate GovernanceEmployment & LaborEnvironmental LawGeneral PracticeHealthcare & Life SciencesImmigrationIntellectual PropertyInternational TradeLegal EducationMergers & AcquisitionsPrivacy & Data ProtectionReal EstateSecuritiesTax LawTechnology & LicensingFinancial ServicesTechnology & DigitalEnergy & UtilitiesHealthcare & PharmaReal Estate & ConstructionAgriculture & FoodMining & ExtractivesTrade & LogisticsEmployment & WorkforceMedia & TelecomsPublic SectorEnvironment & ClimateEducation