Legal Intelligence · Environmental Law

Environmental Law legal & regulatory updates

Briefly tracks environmental law developments — court rulings, legislation, gazette notices, and regulatory updates — from courts and regulators. 60 updates tracked in the past 30 days, last updated 12 Aug.

Get Environmental Law updates in your inbox
Legal News
Togo
Legal News

Togo Benin Launch Comprehensive Report on Climate Risks to Koutammakou Heritage Site

Togo and Benin have launched a report assessing climate risks and adaptation strategies for the Koutammakou cultural landscape, a cross-border World Heritage site shared by both countries. The assessment aims to guide conservation decisions and mobilize resources to protect the site from climate change impacts. The legal significance of this development lies in its potential to inform conservation efforts and resource allocation for the site. Practitioners should note that the report's findings may influence future management plans and transnational cooperation between Togo and Benin, as mandated by UNESCO. The assessment also highlights the need for greater coordination and capacity-building among local stakeholders. The Koutammakou cultural landscape is protected under the World Heritage Convention (1972), which requires states to ensure the conservation of designated sites. In 2004, Togo's part of the site was inscribed on the UNESCO World Heritage List, while Benin's extension was added in 2023. The report's focus on climate change adaptation strategies reflects the increasing importance of environmental considerations in cultural heritage management. The key parties involved include the governments of Togo and Benin, as well as UNESCO, which has been monitoring the site's conservation efforts. Local stakeholders, including the Batammariba people, are also crucial to the report's implementation. Practitioners should monitor further developments on this matter, particularly with regards to the establishment of a transnational management body and joint management plan.

11 Aug
United States
Case Law

Ninth Circuit Denies California Water Rights Curtailment Orders Due Process

California companies, Los Molinos Mutual Water Company, Stanford Vina Ranch Irrigation Company, and Peyton Pacific Properties, argued before a Ninth Circuit panel that the state wrongly curtailed their water rights and denied them a due process hearing and compensation. The appeal focuses on water rights held in Mill and Deer creeks in Tehama County, which allow the companies to divert water for some 11,000 acres of land with orchards, pasture, and other uses. The legal significance of this case lies in its potential impact on the balance between private property rights and state regulation. The companies' argument that the State Water Resources Control Board's characterization of an adjudicatory action as legislative denied them due process and constitutional rights is a critical issue for practitioners to monitor. If successful, the appeal could establish new precedents for water rights cases in California. The relevant statutes and regulations involved include the California Constitution, which guarantees due process and equal protection under the law, and the State Water Resources Control Board's authority to regulate water rights. The court hierarchy is also relevant, as the Ninth Circuit panel will review the lower court's decision and potentially set new precedents for future cases. The key parties involved are the companies, Los Molinos Mutual Water Company, Stanford Vina Ranch Irrigation Company, and Peyton Pacific Properties, which are seeking due process and compensation for the taking of their water rights. The State Water Resources Control Board is also a critical party, as its characterization of an adjudicatory action as legislative is at the heart of the companies' appeal. Practitioners should monitor this case closely, as it has significant implications for the balance between private property rights and state regulation in California. Attorneys representing clients with water rights interests should be aware of the potential impact on their cases and consider filing similar appeals if necessary.

11 Aug

Environmental Law coverage by jurisdiction

Other topics