US District Court D.C.: Lannom v. Riley 24-3508 D.C. Civil Case Filed

• A new civil case, Lannom v. Riley, has been filed in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.
• The plaintiff in the case is identified as Jennifer Lannom, and the defendant is named Riley.
• The case has been assigned the docket number Civil Case No. 24-3508 (RJL).
• This filing represents the "original document," marking the formal initiation of the legal proceedings in federal court.

A new civil legal action, identified as Lannom v. Riley, has officially commenced within the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.

A new civil legal action, identified as Lannom v. Riley, has officially commenced within the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. The case, bearing the docket number Civil Case No. 24-3508 (RJL), lists Jennifer Lannom as the plaintiff. This initial filing marks the formal beginning of a legal dispute in the federal court system, establishing the parties and the judicial forum for their dispute.

The defendant in this D.C. civil litigation is identified simply as Riley. The designation of the filing as an "original document" signifies that this is the very first submission to the court, initiating the legal process. The assignment of a unique case number, 24-3508 (RJL), ensures proper tracking and identification of the proceedings as they unfold within the federal judiciary, a standard procedure for all new cases.

The United States District Court for the District of Columbia serves as the primary trial court for federal cases arising within the nation's capital. Its jurisdiction encompasses a wide array of civil matters, including those involving federal law, disputes between citizens of different states, or cases where the U.S. government is a party. The filing of Jennifer Lannom v. Riley in this specific court indicates that the dispute falls under federal purview, requiring resolution within the federal judicial framework.

This court plays a critical role in the administration of justice in Washington D.C., handling a significant volume of D.C. civil litigation. The choice of this forum for the Lannom v. Riley 24-3508 D.C. case implies that the plaintiff believes the legal grounds for their claim are appropriately addressed by federal statutes or constitutional principles, or that other jurisdictional requirements for federal court are met.

The filing of an "original document" in a civil case like Jennifer Lannom v. Riley initiates a structured legal process. Following this initial submission, the plaintiff, Jennifer Lannom, is typically responsible for formally notifying the defendant, Riley, of the lawsuit through a process known as service of process. This ensures the defendant is aware of the allegations and has an opportunity to respond.

Upon successful service, the defendant is then required to file a response with the court, which could take the form of an answer to the complaint, a motion to dismiss, or other preliminary filings. The case number, Civil Case No. 24-3508 (RJL), will be used for all subsequent filings and communications related to this specific legal action, guiding its progression through discovery, potential settlement negotiations, and, if necessary, trial.

The commencement of any civil action in a federal court, including Lannom v. Riley 24-3508 D.C., represents a formal invocation of the judicial system to resolve a dispute. While the specific details of the claims brought by Jennifer Lannom against Riley are not disclosed in the initial filing information, the act itself signals the beginning of a public legal process. All documents subsequently filed in this case, unless sealed by court order, will become part of the public record, accessible to interested parties and the public.

This new entry into the federal docket underscores the ongoing activity within the US District Court District of Columbia and the continuous flow of legal challenges being brought before it. The progression of Civil Case No. 24-3508 (RJL) will follow established federal rules of civil procedure, ultimately aiming for a resolution, whether through settlement, dismissal, or a judicial decision.

Based on the provided text, which only identifies a new civil case filing by name and docket number, there is no actionable legal implication or specific advice for lawyers or compliance officers. Further details on the case's subject matter would be required to assess its practical relevance.

Source: Original reporting via court filing