Briefly
Live preview · United States

Legal and Regulatory intelligence for you

Legal News
United States
Legal News

OpenAI: Astra for Law GPT-6 Powers Legal AI Search Index

On September 17, 2026, OpenAI unveiled "Astra for Law: GPT-6 Astra," a new generative artificial intelligence model specifically designed for professional legal work, in an unspecified jurisdiction (implied U.S. due to caselaw references). This model aims to assist lawyers with legal research, argument development, and case analysis by offering a dedicated legal search index and custom instructions. It boasts the ability to search U.S. caselaw, statutes, regulations, court rules, and administrative decisions across over 230 million URLs, partnering with the Free Law Project to extend access to caselaw. Crucially, OpenAI is incorporating "legal-grade trust and controls," including zero data retention and exclusion of ChatGPT Enterprise usage from human review, to address client confidentiality concerns, and is launching a "trusted access program" for eligible legal professionals. The outcome of this product launch, in terms of its adoption and impact, is not yet reported. This development carries significant legal significance for practitioners, potentially revolutionizing how legal services are delivered and managed. The introduction of a specialized AI model with a dedicated legal search index and custom analytical capabilities could dramatically enhance efficiency in legal research, drafting, and case strategy. For law firms, this could mean reduced time spent on routine tasks, allowing attorneys to focus on higher-value strategic work. However, it also raises critical questions regarding the ethical use of AI, data security, attorney-client privilege, and the potential for over-reliance on automated tools. The emphasis on "legal-grade trust and controls" and zero data retention is a direct response to these concerns, indicating an understanding of the stringent confidentiality requirements within the legal profession. The legal context for such a tool is multifaceted, primarily revolving around professional responsibility and data privacy. While no specific statutes are directly invoked by the product's launch, its use by attorneys will be governed by rules of professional conduct, such as those concerning competence (e.g., ABA Model Rule 1.1), confidentiality (Model Rule 1.6), and supervision of non-lawyer assistants (Model Rule 5.3). The partnership with the Free Law Project underscores the importance of reliable and comprehensive legal data sources, which are foundational to legal practice. The courts and regulatory bodies will likely monitor the adoption and impact of such technologies, potentially issuing guidance or new rules regarding their ethical deployment. Key parties involved include OpenAI as the developer, law firms like Cooley, Ropes & Gray, and Sullivan & Cromwell who are collaborating on integration, and the Free Law Project as a data partner. Practitioners should closely monitor the capabilities and limitations of Astra for Law: GPT-6 Astra and similar AI tools. Attorneys must conduct thorough due diligence to ensure that any AI solution used complies with their ethical obligations, particularly regarding client confidentiality, data security, and the accuracy of information generated. Firms should evaluate the "trusted access program" and data retention policies offered by OpenAI. It is imperative for legal professionals to understand that while AI can be a powerful assistant, it does not replace human judgment, critical thinking, or the ultimate responsibility for legal advice. Training and clear internal policies on AI usage will be crucial to mitigate risks and harness the benefits effectively.

17 Sept
United States
Legal News

Donald Trump: His AI Regulation Stance Rejects Oversight

President Donald Trump has expressed opposition to any form of artificial intelligence regulation. This stance contrasts with major tech company CEOs who are actively requesting a regulatory framework for AI, despite some alarmist predictions about its risks.

16 Sept
United States
Case Law

Ninth Circuit: Affirms DMCA Copilot Copyright Appeal Dismissal

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed Digital Millennium Copyright Act claims against GitHub Copilot and OpenAI Codex. The court ruled that DMCA 1202 does not apply when AI tools create new works that never contained copyright management information, rather than altering existing works.

16 Sept
United States
Legal News

Alice Boldis Agentic AI Webinar: Voith Legal Prepares for AI-Native Contracting

A CLE webinar on September 30, 2026, will explore the impact of agentic AI on corporate law. Alice Boldis, Vice President Compliance and Contract Management for Voith Hydro Holding GmbH & Co. KG, a division of the global industrial powerhouse Voith Group, will discuss using agentic tools for complex

16 Sept
United States
Legal News

D&AD Study: AI Impact on Lawyer Creativity, Atrophy Risk

A D&AD study, "The Cost of the Shortcut," warns that AI could diminish human creative judgment by automating tasks crucial for developing critical thinking. The research, which interviewed 197 non-lawyer creative leaders, suggests AI cannot be truly original and risks atrophying essential human skil

16 Sept
United States
Case Law

Eve AI Platform Plaintiffs Law Firms: Jay Madheswaran on Workflow Impact

On September 16, 2026, Jay Madheswaran, CEO and co-founder of Eve, discussed how generative AI is transforming plaintiffs' law firms on the ABA Journal's Legal Rebels Podcast. Eve is an AI platform and operating system designed to enhance efficiency and client representation capacity for plaintiffs'

16 Sept
United States
Case Law

Colorado Springs Refunds 700 Drivers After Vendor Software Update Doubled Speed Camera Fines

A July 21 software update by automated enforcement vendor Verra Mobility caused Colorado Springs police to overcharge 2,764 speed camera citations at $80 instead of $40, with 700 drivers who already paid now receiving refund checks.

16 Sept
United States
Legal News

Los Angeles Superior Court: Jacquelene Robinson Fined for AI Fabricated Citations

On September 15, 2026, the Los Angeles County Superior Court fined senior associate Jacquelene Robinson of Musick, Peeler & Garrett almost $1,000 for submitting a brief containing fabricated case citations. This incident involved Jacquelene Robinson, who was fined $999.99 by the Los Angeles County Superior Court after opposing counsel brought to the court's attention that a brief she submitted in defense of State Farm Insurance Co. in a breach of contract claim contained fabricated case citations. In response, Robinson filed a declaration on September 3, apologizing to the court and detailing her commitment to preventing future errors. Her proposed measures include independently retrieving all authorities from reliable sources like Westlaw or LexisNexis, verifying all quotes against actual opinions, and conducting citation audits before filing. She also attended a CLE course on AI ethics for lawyers, acknowledging her personal responsibility for the filing's accuracy. This case carries significant legal significance for practitioners, highlighting the critical ethical and professional responsibility implications of using generative artificial intelligence in legal practice. Fabricated citations, regardless of their origin, constitute a serious breach of an attorney's duty of candor to the tribunal and can lead to severe sanctions, reputational damage, and potential malpractice claims. The incident underscores the imperative for attorneys to maintain diligence and verify all AI-generated content, particularly legal research, and serves as a stark warning about the risks associated with over-reliance on AI tools without proper human oversight and verification. The legal context for this matter primarily involves rules of professional conduct, such as those governing candor toward the tribunal (e.g., ABA Model Rule 3.3), competence (Model Rule 1.1), and the supervision of legal work (Model Rules 5.1 and 5.3). Courts, including the Los Angeles County Superior Court, a state trial court in California, possess inherent authority to impose sanctions for attorney misconduct. The firm's internal policy on AI use and the attorney's subsequent attendance at an AI ethics CLE course reflect a growing awareness within the legal profession of the need to address the ethical challenges posed by emerging technologies. Practitioners must exercise extreme caution and implement robust verification protocols when using generative AI for legal research and drafting. Law firms should establish clear, mandatory policies on AI usage, emphasizing the absolute necessity of human review and validation for all AI-generated legal content, especially citations and factual assertions. Regular training on AI ethics and responsible technology use is essential to mitigate risks. This case unequivocally reinforces that the ultimate responsibility for the accuracy and integrity of court filings rests with the attorney, irrespective of the tools employed in their preparation. Attorneys should proactively integrate verification steps, such as cross-referencing with established legal databases, into their workflow to prevent AI-induced errors and avoid potential sanctions.

15 Sept
United States
Legal News

ILTA 2026 Survey: Law Firm AI Usage Soars, Copilot Leads

In 2026, the International Legal Technology Association (ILTA) released its technology survey findings, revealing that Microsoft 365 Copilot is the most popular generative AI tool among law firms globally, with 76% usage or exploration, significantly outperforming dedicated legal AI vendors like CoCounsel and Harvey. This development is highly significant for legal practitioners as it indicates a strong and growing preference for integrated, general-purpose AI tools over specialized legal AI solutions within the legal industry. The survey, spanning over 500 law firms across a dozen countries, highlights a substantial increase in generative AI adoption, with 94% of firms now using or exploring these tools, up from 80% last year. This trend suggests that law firms are increasingly leveraging existing enterprise technology ecosystems for AI capabilities, potentially influencing future technology procurement strategies, vendor partnerships, and the overall development trajectory of legal tech. The data also reveals interesting variations in AI adoption based on firm size, with larger firms showing a narrower gap between Copilot and other leading legal AI products like Harvey. While not a legal ruling, this survey reflects the evolving regulatory and ethical landscape surrounding AI in legal practice across various jurisdictions. Law firms operating in different countries, including those represented by ILTA members, must navigate complex ethical guidelines for AI use, data privacy concerns (e.g., GDPR, CCPA, local data protection laws), and professional responsibility rules concerning competence, confidentiality, and the unauthorized practice of law. The preference for Microsoft 365 Copilot suggests firms may be leveraging existing enterprise agreements and security frameworks, which are often subject to stringent compliance requirements, thereby integrating AI within established IT governance structures. This also underscores the competitive market where general tech giants are becoming formidable players in the legal tech space. The key parties involved in this report are the International Legal Technology Association (ILTA), which conducted the survey, and the over 500 law firms, representing 140,000 lawyers across a dozen countries, who participated. The prominent AI vendors mentioned include Microsoft (365 Copilot), Thomson Reuters (CoCounsel), Harvey, Anthropics (Claude), Legora, Lexis+AI, ChatGPT Enterprise, iManage, and Litera One. The survey's findings provide a snapshot of the current market penetration and perceived value of these various AI solutions within the legal sector. Attorneys and law firms should closely monitor the continued evolution of AI tools, particularly the integration of general-purpose AI into existing enterprise platforms. Practitioners should critically evaluate their current AI strategies, considering the balance between specialized legal AI solutions and broader, integrated tools like Microsoft 365 Copilot, especially regarding data security, ethical compliance, cost-effectiveness, and interoperability with existing systems. Understanding the market trends revealed by this comprehensive survey can inform strategic technology investments, guide internal training initiatives, and ensure that legal professionals remain competent and competitive in an increasingly AI-driven legal landscape, while also being mindful of the ethical obligations associated with AI deployment.

15 Sept