SYNAFOC: Affirms Régularité of Joslin Mayebi Assemblée Élective

• SYNAFOC has responded to a communiqué from Joslin Mayebi Leonel and three others, who announced legal action to annul the union's September 2 elective General Assembly.
• The union asserts the assembly was regular, with participation and voting restricted to members current on their dues, as per its internal regulations.
• SYNAFOC clarified that the title of "Regional Delegate" does not automatically grant membership, which requires payment of adhesion fees or annual contributions.
• The union claims no information indicates the individuals cited by Mayebi met the necessary membership conditions.
• SYNAFOC confirmed the electoral process was managed by an independent commission responsible for candidate eligibility, ballot conduct, and vote counting.

SYNAFOC vigorously defended the regularity of its recent elective assembly, asserting that the gathering was convened through proper procedures.

The Syndicat National des Footballeurs Camerounais (SYNAFOC) has formally addressed a communiqué issued on September 22, 2026, by Joslin Mayebi Leonel and three individuals identified as "Regional Delegates." This communiqué publicly announced their intention to initiate legal proceedings aimed at securing the annulment of the ordinary and elective General Assembly, which SYNAFOC conducted on September 2 in Douala.

In its official response, SYNAFOC acknowledged the right of any member to pursue legal action through the competent jurisdictions. The union affirmed its commitment to due process, stating it would present its observations and arguments before the courts in adherence to the principle of adversarial debate. However, SYNAFOC explicitly declined to comment on the substantive merits of the legal actions currently being pursued against it.

SYNAFOC vigorously defended the regularity of its recent elective assembly, asserting that the gathering was convened through proper procedures. The union emphasized that invitations were extended exclusively to members who were current with their financial contributions, as these are the only individuals authorized by the union's internal regulations to participate in the proceedings and cast votes. This stance is central to SYNAFOC's argument concerning the `régularité` of the `assemblée élective` contested by `Joslin Mayebi`.

The union further clarified that merely holding the title of "Regional Delegate" does not automatically confer membership status. Membership, according to SYNAFOC's statutes, is contingent upon fulfilling specific financial obligations, including the payment of adhesion fees or annual dues. SYNAFOC stated that, to date, it possesses no information confirming that the individuals named in Joslin Mayebi's communiqué met these essential membership criteria. The `Syndicat National des Footballeurs Camerounais contentieux` thus hinges on adherence to internal statutes.

Regarding the electoral process itself, SYNAFOC maintained that the September 2 elections were conducted under the supervision of an independent electoral commission. This commission was specifically tasked with overseeing critical aspects of the election, including the review of candidate eligibility, the management of the balloting process, and the accurate counting of votes. This robust process, according to the union, underscores the `démocratie syndicale Cameroun litige` and the integrity of the `règlement intérieur SYNAFOC élection`.

Reaffirming its unwavering commitment to its foundational statutory texts and the principles of union democracy, SYNAFOC urged its members to rely solely on official communications from the organization. This appeal aims to maintain unity and clarity amidst the `contestation électorale syndicat footballeurs`.

In light of the various allegations made against the union and its leadership, SYNAFOC explicitly reserved its right to pursue any legal recourse it deems necessary. This proactive stance indicates the union's readiness to defend its reputation and operational integrity against what it perceives as unfounded claims, highlighting the ongoing `annulation assemblée générale SYNAFOC Cameroun` dispute.

Lawyers advising unions, associations, or other member-based organizations in Cameroon should note the critical importance of strict adherence to internal statutes and election procedures to prevent challenges to governance decisions. This case highlights the potential for internal disputes to escalate into legal proceedings, requiring robust documentation of compliance with membership criteria and electoral processes.

Source: Original reporting via Actu Cameroun