Sudan: Ethiopia Drone Attacks Complaint Filed With UN

• Sudan has filed a formal complaint against Ethiopia with the UN Security Council and the African Peace and Security Council.
• The complaint accuses Ethiopia of involvement in drone attacks on Sudanese civilian sites and power stations, causing casualties and outages.
• Sudan alleges the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) are launching suicide drones from Ethiopian territory, specifically from bases like Asosa and Bahir Dar.
• Ethiopian bases are also accused of supplying the RSF with weapons and facilitating foreign mercenary fighters.
• Sudan's Foreign Ministry asserts that Ethiopia's alleged actions constitute a hostile act, making it accountable under international law.

In a statement released on Sunday, the Sudanese Foreign Ministry unequivocally declared that the Rapid Support Forces' use of Ethiopian territory to launch attacks against Sudan constitutes a hostile act.

The Sudanese government formally lodged a complaint against Ethiopia on November 1, 2026, submitting it to both the United Nations Security Council and the African Peace and Security Council. This significant diplomatic action stems from Khartoum's accusations that Addis Ababa is implicated in a series of assaults targeting civilian locations, critical infrastructure, and power facilities across various Sudanese states. These alleged attacks have resulted in civilian casualties and widespread disruption of essential public services, prompting Sudan to seek international intervention.

Over the preceding week, Sudan has experienced a systematic campaign of drone attacks specifically aimed at its electricity infrastructure. More than fourteen power distribution stations have sustained severe damage or been directly targeted in states including Gedarif, Khartoum, Al Jazirah, Red Sea, Sennar, White Nile, South Kordofan, River Nile, and Northern. This sustained assault has led to extensive power outages affecting numerous cities throughout the country, exacerbating humanitarian concerns and hindering daily life. The Sudan Ethiopia drone attacks complaint highlights the severe impact on civilian populations and vital services.

The Sudanese government asserts that the drones responsible for these destructive attacks are being launched from bases situated within Ethiopian territory. Specifically, Sudan has identified Asosa and Bahir Dar as locations from which these unmanned aerial vehicles operate. According to the Sudanese Foreign Ministry, comprehensive documentation and evidence have been provided to substantiate claims that the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) are utilizing these Ethiopian sites as launchpads for suicide drones equipped with missiles, which are then directed at civilian targets and crucial national assets within Sudan.

Beyond merely serving as drone launch sites, Khartoum further alleges that these Ethiopian locations are instrumental in providing logistical and material support to the RSF. This alleged support includes the supply of weaponry and equipment to the militia. Furthermore, the Sudanese government claims that these bases facilitate the transit of foreign mercenary fighters who are actively participating in the ongoing aggression against Sudan. These accusations underscore the gravity of the alleged Ethiopia support RSF drone attacks, portraying Ethiopia as a complicit party in the conflict.

In a statement released on Sunday, the Sudanese Foreign Ministry unequivocally declared that the Rapid Support Forces' use of Ethiopian territory to launch attacks against Sudan constitutes a hostile act. This action, according to the ministry, places Ethiopia in direct contravention of international law, holding it accountable for its alleged violations. The Sudan complaint UN Security Council and the Sudan complaint African Peace and Security Council submissions are intended to formally address this perceived breach of international norms and state responsibility.

The Sudanese government's formal complaint emphasizes that such actions represent a profound challenge to the principles of territorial integrity and non-intervention in the internal affairs of sovereign states. By presenting its case to these prominent international and regional bodies, Sudan aims to establish a precedent regarding international law state responsibility Sudan Ethiopia for actions originating from its soil. The Sudan foreign ministry Ethiopia statement underscores the seriousness with which Khartoum views Addis Ababa's alleged role, seeking to invoke the mechanisms of international justice to address what it describes as an act of aggression.

This development signals a significant international legal dispute concerning state responsibility for cross-border attacks by non-state actors. Lawyers should closely track the proceedings at the UN Security Council and African Peace and Security Council for potential precedents on the attribution of acts to states and the interpretation of international law regarding territorial integrity and non-intervention in armed conflicts.

Source: Original reporting via Sudan Tribune