Florida 4DCA: Gregory Rosenbaum v Florida Insurance Guaranty Association Appeal
Case Law

Florida 4DCA: Gregory Rosenbaum v Florida Insurance Guaranty Association Appeal

United States·Briefly Analysis⏱️ 3 min read

Summary

  • Gregory Rosenbaum and Patricia Rosenbaum have filed an appeal against the Florida Insurance Guaranty Association, Inc.
  • The appeal is lodged with the District Court of Appeal of the State of Florida, Fourth District.
  • The case is identified by the number 4D2025-1179 and was recorded on October 14, 2026.
  • This legal action is characterized as an "Appeal from Original document."

What Happened

The filing of this appeal, Gregory Rosenbaum v Florida Insurance Guaranty Association, initiates a new phase in the legal dispute between the parties.

An appeal has been formally lodged with the District Court of Appeal of the State of Florida, Fourth District, involving Gregory Rosenbaum and Patricia Rosenbaum as the appellants. The legal action names the Florida Insurance Guaranty Association, Inc. as the appellee in this proceeding. This case, officially designated as No. 4D2025-1179, signifies a challenge to a prior determination.

The record indicates that this particular case is an "Appeal from Original document," suggesting a review of a decision or order that originated from a lower tribunal or administrative body. The appellate court's documentation for this matter was recorded on October 14, 2026, marking the official date of the appeal's entry into the appellate system. The filing of this appeal, Gregory Rosenbaum v Florida Insurance Guaranty Association, initiates a new phase in the legal dispute between the parties.

Legal Context

The District Court of Appeal of the State of Florida, Fourth District, serves as an intermediate appellate court within the state's judicial structure. Its primary function is to review decisions made by lower courts and administrative agencies to ensure legal correctness and procedural fairness. Cases heard by this court, such as Rosenbaum v FIGA, typically involve parties seeking to overturn or affirm judgments based on alleged errors of law or fact.

The Florida Insurance Guaranty Association, Inc. (FIGA), the appellee in this case, is a non-profit entity established under Florida law. Its purpose is to protect policyholders in the event that their insurance company becomes insolvent. FIGA steps in to pay covered claims of insolvent property and casualty insurers, subject to statutory limits. Therefore, the involvement of FIGA in a Florida insurance guaranty association case often indicates that the underlying dispute may stem from an insurance claim where the original insurer is no longer able to meet its obligations, leading to an appeal from an original document related to such a claim.

Why It Matters

The existence of an appeal, particularly one identified by the case number 4D2025-1179, underscores an ongoing legal disagreement where at least one party believes a prior decision warrants reconsideration by a higher authority. While the specific details of the original document being appealed are not publicly disclosed in this initial record, the fact that Gregory Rosenbaum and Patricia Rosenbaum are pursuing this action against the Florida Insurance Guaranty Association, Inc. highlights a continued effort to resolve their dispute through the appellate process.

This case, Gregory Rosenbaum v Florida Insurance Guaranty Association, represents a standard yet crucial function of the legal system: providing avenues for parties to seek redress and ensure that legal principles are applied correctly. The outcome of such an appeal, once determined by the Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal, could clarify legal interpretations relevant to insurance claims handled by FIGA, even if the specific implications for other cases are not immediately apparent without further details on the appeal's subject matter.

Practical Implications

This is an appeal from an original document. Without the details of the appeal's subject matter or its outcome, there is no actionable legal implication for a lawyer or compliance officer beyond noting the existence of this specific case.

Source

Source: Information derived from Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal records.

Get Deeper AI analysis

How does this affect you?

Get an AI analysis of this article grounded in your jurisdictions, practice areas, and any policy documents you've uploaded to Wansom.

Finish Reading the Full Story and the Expert Analysis.

Get the latest legal & regulatory intelligence in United States

Instant access to full analysis, cited statutes & expert commentary
Customize your dashboard to track what matters to your business operations

Already have an account? Log in

Wansom is AI and can make mistakes.