US 11th Circuit: Kashyap Bakhai v. BDO USA, P.C. Appellate Order

The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit filed a document, identified as Document 46-1, in the case of *Kashyap Bakhai v. BDO USA, P.C.* (Case No. 25-12797) on September 8, 2026.

This filing indicates ongoing appellate litigation involving a prominent accounting and advisory firm, BDO USA, P.C., in the Eleventh Circuit. The "NOT FOR PUBLICATION" designation is particularly significant for practitioners, as it means the court's decision in this matter, whatever its substance, will not serve as binding precedent for future cases. While it resolves the dispute between the immediate parties, it does not contribute to the body of precedential case law, limiting its broader impact on legal interpretation or development within the circuit. However, it still represents a final determination of the issues presented by the parties in this specific appeal.

The legal context for this case is the federal appellate system, with the Eleventh Circuit serving as a federal appellate court with jurisdiction over federal district courts in Alabama, Florida, and Georgia. Its role is to review decisions made by lower federal courts within its geographical purview. The "Non-Argument Calendar" designation suggests that the panel of judges determined that oral argument was not necessary, often because the legal issues are deemed straightforward, or the facts are not in dispute, and the briefs adequately present the arguments. The "NOT FOR PUBLICATION" status is governed by the circuit's local rules, which typically allow for such designations when a case does not establish new law, alter existing law, or involve issues of general public interest. This practice aims to manage the volume of published opinions while still providing a resolution for the parties.

The key parties involved are the appellant, Kashyap Bakhai, and the appellee, BDO USA, P.C., a professional services firm. The judicial body involved is the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. The specific nature of the underlying dispute (e.g., contract, tort, employment, or other federal question) is not disclosed in the excerpt, nor is the outcome of the appeal.

Attorneys practicing in the Eleventh Circuit should note that while this case provides a resolution for the parties, its "NOT FOR PUBLICATION" status means it cannot be cited as binding precedent in other cases. While it might offer persuasive authority in very similar factual scenarios, its precedential value is explicitly limited. Practitioners should always check the publication status of any appellate decision they intend to rely upon. For firms like BDO USA, P.C., involvement in appellate litigation, even if non-precedential, underscores the importance of robust internal compliance, risk management, and litigation defense strategies, as such cases can still be costly and time-consuming.