Tony Greenidge 26-12477 Eleventh Circuit: Non-Argument Opinion Not For Publication

• A document was filed in the case of Tony Greenidge v. Florida Department of Revenue in the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals.
• The filing, identified as case number 26-12477, occurred on September 11, 2026.
• The case is designated as 'NOT FOR PUBLICATION' and is on the 'Non-Argument Calendar' of the USCA11.
• This means any resulting opinion will not have precedential value and cannot be cited as authority in other cases.
• The impact of the ruling is limited solely to the parties involved in this specific dispute.

Lawyers should note that such a ruling cannot be cited as authoritative case law in other disputes, even if those cases involve similar facts or legal questions.

A document has been filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit concerning the case of Tony Greenidge against the Florida Department of Revenue. This filing, identified by case number 26-12477 and document number 9-1, was officially recorded on September 11, 2026. The document itself spans two pages, with the initial page containing critical procedural markers.

The appellate proceeding, titled *Tony Greenidge v. Florida Department of Revenue*, indicates a dispute involving a state revenue agency. The specific nature of the underlying tax appeal is not detailed in the filing information, but such cases typically involve challenges to tax assessments, interpretations of state tax statutes, or administrative decisions made by the Florida Department of Revenue. The involvement of the Eleventh Circuit suggests that the matter has either progressed through state judicial channels to raise a federal question or falls under the court's diversity jurisdiction, though the precise jurisdictional basis is not specified in the available record.

Crucially, the document explicitly states that it is 'NOT FOR PUBLICATION' and has been assigned to the 'Non-Argument Calendar' by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (USCA11). These designations carry significant implications for the legal community and the broader impact of any subsequent ruling in case 26-12477.

Placement on the Non-Argument Calendar signifies that the appellate panel has determined the case can be decided without the need for oral arguments from the parties. This procedural track is typically reserved for cases deemed straightforward, those where the legal issues are well-settled, or where the appeal lacks substantial merit. The 'not for publication' status, a common practice in federal appellate courts, further defines the scope and reach of the court's decision in this specific matter.

The 'NOT FOR PUBLICATION' designation means that any opinion or order issued in *Greenidge v. Florida Department of Revenue* will not serve as binding precedent for future cases within the Eleventh Circuit. Lawyers should note that such a ruling cannot be cited as authoritative case law in other disputes, even if those cases involve similar facts or legal questions. This policy is designed to prevent the proliferation of opinions that do not establish new legal principles or significantly contribute to the development of Florida tax appeal case law.

Consequently, the impact of the Eleventh Circuit's decision in this matter is strictly confined to the immediate parties involved: Tony Greenidge and the Florida Department of Revenue. While the outcome will resolve the specific dispute between them, it will not influence how other courts or litigants approach comparable issues. This distinction is vital for understanding the narrow scope of such appellate dispositions.

Lawyers should note that this Eleventh Circuit ruling is not for publication, meaning it holds no precedential value and cannot be cited as authority in other cases. Its impact is limited to the parties involved in this specific dispute.

Source: Original reporting via court filing