Sonko: Uhuru Orchestrated Impeachment, Graft Framing in Kenya

• Former Nairobi Governor Mike Sonko testified that retired President Uhuru Kenyatta orchestrated his impeachment and influenced his prosecution on fabricated corruption charges.
• Sonko alleged Kenyatta bribed senators to support his removal and accused the Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EACC) of framing him in the ongoing graft case.
• He claimed his troubles began after refusing an order to demolish structures for a highway and linked them to Kenyatta's alleged business interests in Nairobi County.
• Sonko stated that several county functions were transferred to the national government during Kenyatta's administration, contributing to his curtailed tenure.
• These significant allegations were made during his defense testimony before trial magistrate Isabella Barasa and have not yet been established as facts by the court.

It is crucial to note that these accusations against both former President Kenyatta and the EACC were made by Sonko during his testimony and have have not yet been substantiated as factual by the court.

Former Nairobi Governor Mike Sonko recently presented his defense, making significant claims that retired President Uhuru Kenyatta masterminded his removal from office. Sonko alleged that senators were financially induced to support his impeachment, further claiming that Kenyatta influenced his prosecution on corruption charges, which the former governor insists were fabricated. This testimony marks a critical moment in his ongoing legal battle.

Specifically, Sonko stated that the former President provided bribes to senators who ultimately voted to uphold his impeachment, following its passage by the Nairobi County Assembly. These Nairobi Governor impeachment bribery claims form a central part of his defense. Furthermore, Sonko leveled accusations against the Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EACC), asserting they fabricated the graft case he currently faces in court, highlighting what he describes as EACC framing allegations Kenya.

Sonko elaborated on the supposed origins of his difficulties, linking them to Kenyatta's alleged personal and family business interests within Nairobi County. He suggested these commercial stakes were intertwined with the political tensions that characterized his administration, providing a potential motive for the alleged orchestration of his downfall. According to Sonko, his troubles escalated after he purportedly declined an instruction to dismantle various structures across the county, an order he explained was intended to clear the path for a new highway construction project.

He further detailed how several critical county functions, including transport, health services, and revenue collection, were transferred to the national government during Kenyatta's presidential term. Sonko contended that this transfer of responsibilities, coupled with his subsequent impeachment, prematurely ended his tenure at City Hall, underscoring the political interference corruption charges Kenya.

The former governor presented these significant allegations during his defense testimony before trial magistrate Isabella Barasa on a Monday. His statements, which include the Sonko defense testimony Uhuru, were delivered through his legal representative, Assah Nyakundi. Sonko consistently maintained that the corruption charges brought against him were politically motivated, asserting that his removal from office was a result of deliberate interference in the impeachment process.

It is crucial to note that these accusations against both former President Kenyatta and the EACC were made by Sonko during his testimony and have not yet been substantiated as factual by the court. The judicial proceedings are slated to resume on Tuesday, September 29, 2026, for further hearing, where these claims will continue to be examined.

The ongoing legal battle, marked by Sonko's defense testimony, sheds light on the complexities of high-profile political and corruption cases in Kenya. His claims of executive interference and bribery in the impeachment process, alongside allegations of graft framing by a key anti-corruption body, highlight significant concerns regarding governance and accountability within the nation. The assertion that his removal was orchestrated through political interference underscores the persistent challenges in upholding the integrity of public office and judicial processes.

These proceedings offer a window into potential defense strategies for individuals facing politically charged corruption or impeachment proceedings in Kenya, particularly when allegations of executive manipulation are central to their case. The testimony by Mike Sonko regarding Uhuru Kenyatta graft framing provides a detailed narrative of alleged political machinations at the highest levels.

This ongoing testimony provides insights into potential defense strategies for clients facing politically charged corruption or impeachment proceedings in Kenya, particularly concerning allegations of executive interference and bribery.

Source: Original reporting via local media