Price v ICAO 26CA0366 Colorado: Court Affirms ICAO Order

• The Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed an order in the case of *Price v. ICAO* on September 24, 2026.
• Petitioner Michael Price appealed a decision from the Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the State of Colorado, identified as DD No. 17982-2025.
• The appellate ruling, designated as case number 26CA0366, was authored by Judge Pawar with Judges Brown and Moultrie concurring.
• This Colorado workers' compensation case's opinion is marked as 'NOT PUBLISHED,' meaning it does not set legal precedent for future cases.

The affirmation by the Colorado Court of Appeals means that the appellate panel found no reversible error in the ICAO's original order.

The Colorado Court of Appeals has affirmed an order in the case of *Price v. ICAO*, identified by appellate case number 26CA0366. This decision, issued on September 24, 2026, concludes the appellate review for petitioner Michael Price against the Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the State of Colorado (ICAO).

Division VII of the Colorado Court of Appeals, with Judge Pawar authoring the opinion, upheld the prior determination. Judges Brown and Moultrie concurred with the ruling. The affirmed order originated from the Industrial Claim Appeals Office, bearing the designation DD No. 17982-2025, indicating its administrative history within the industrial claims system.

This specific Colorado workers' compensation case highlights the appellate process for industrial claims in the state. The Industrial Claim Appeals Office Colorado (ICAO) serves as an administrative body responsible for reviewing decisions made by administrative law judges in workers' compensation disputes. Parties dissatisfied with an ICAO decision, such as Michael Price in this instance, have the right to seek further review from the Colorado Court of Appeals.

The affirmation by the Colorado Court of Appeals means that the appellate panel found no reversible error in the ICAO's original order. For the parties involved in *Price v. ICAO 26CA0366 Colorado*, this signifies the conclusion of the judicial review process at the appellate level, upholding the administrative body's findings or conclusions. The case number 26CA0366 uniquely identifies this particular appeal within the Colorado Court of Appeals' docket.

A key aspect of this ruling is its 'NOT PUBLISHED' status. In Colorado, an unpublished opinion, while binding on the parties involved in the specific case, does not establish precedent for future cases. This means that while the outcome for Michael Price and the Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the State of Colorado is final, the legal reasoning or specific findings within Judge Pawar's opinion cannot be cited as authoritative legal precedent in other industrial claims or workers' compensation matters.

The decision to not publish an opinion is typically made when the court determines that the case does not involve novel legal questions, does not alter existing law, or is primarily fact-specific. Therefore, while the affirmation provides a definitive resolution for the parties in this particular Colorado workers' compensation case, its broader impact on legal interpretation or future industrial claims is limited due to its non-precedential nature.

This article is a brief docket entry indicating that an order in *Price v. ICAO* was affirmed by the Colorado Court of Appeals. Without the full opinion text, there is no practical implication or actionable advice for lawyers or compliance officers beyond noting the procedural outcome of this specific industrial claims case.

Source: Original reporting via Colorado Court of Appeals docket