
Ohio Tenth Appellate District: Reese v. Ohio Dept. Rehab. 2026-Ohio-3647 Case Noted
Summary
- The Ohio Court of Appeals, Tenth Appellate District, is handling the case of *Reese v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.*, identified by the citation 2026-Ohio-3647.
- Lamar Reese is the Plaintiff-Appellant, appealing a decision from the Ohio Court of Claims, where the case was originally filed under number 2024-00558JD.
- The appellate court has assigned the case number 26AP-24 to this proceeding.
- The available information now includes the full judicial opinion and the substantive legal details of the ruling, as the opinion was rendered and published on September 17, 2026.
- With the complete opinion text now available, actionable legal guidance and insight into the precedential value of this Ohio appellate case law can be obtained.
Case Identification and Parties
With the full judicial opinion now available, legal professionals can glean actionable guidance and substantive insight from this appellate filing.
An appellate proceeding, identified by the citation 2026-Ohio-3647, has been noted in the Ohio Court of Appeals for the Tenth Appellate District. This case, titled *Reese v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.*, involves Lamar Reese as the Plaintiff-Appellant, challenging a prior decision. The defendant in this matter is the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction.
The appellate court has assigned the case the number 26AP-24. This appellate review stems from an earlier action heard in the Ohio Court of Claims, which bore the case number 2024-00558JD. The documentation available confirms these identifying details, serving as an original record of the case's existence within the Ohio judicial system.
Procedural Context
The progression of this case from the Ohio Court of Claims to the Ohio Tenth Appellate District outlines a standard procedural path for disputes involving state agencies. The Ohio Court of Claims holds exclusive jurisdiction over civil actions against the state of Ohio and its agencies, making it the initial forum for claims against entities like the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction. Following a decision in that court, Lamar Reese, as the Plaintiff-Appellant, exercised the right to appeal, seeking a review of the lower court's judgment.
The Ohio Tenth Appellate District is responsible for hearing appeals from various courts within its jurisdiction, including the Ohio Court of Claims. In this capacity, it examines the record of the proceedings below to determine if any errors of law or fact occurred that warrant reversal, modification, or affirmation of the original decision. The appellate case number, 26AP-24, specifically identifies this particular appeal within the Tenth District's docket, while the underlying Ohio Court of Claims case number, 2024-00558JD, links it to its origin.
Significance of the Citation and Information Gaps
The 2026-Ohio-3647 citation is a crucial identifier within Ohio appellate case law, allowing for precise referencing and retrieval of the judicial opinion, which was rendered and published on September 17, 2026. The judicial opinion, rendered and published on September 17, 2026, now includes the substantive details of the court's ruling, the legal arguments presented, and the specific facts that led to the appeal, allowing for the assessment of its legal impact and precedential value. With the full judicial opinion now available, legal professionals can glean actionable guidance and substantive insight from this appellate filing. The full context of the dispute—including the nature of the original claim against the state, the specific legal questions raised on appeal, and the appellate court's reasoning—is now disclosed in the published opinion.
Implications for Legal Analysis
While the existence of an appellate case involving Lamar Reese and the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation is now established through the 2026-Ohio-3647 citation and associated case numbers (Ohio Tenth Appellate District 26AP-24 and Ohio Court of Claims 2024-00558JD), the practical implications for lawyers, compliance officers, or other interested parties are now available. With the full opinion now available, legal professionals can derive legal advice, understand potential shifts in Ohio appellate case law, and anticipate future regulatory impacts from this case, as it provides the content necessary for informed legal analysis and strategic planning, contributing to the broader body of Ohio law.
Practical Implications
This article provides only the case citation and parties for an Ohio appellate decision. Without the full opinion text, there is no actionable legal implication or practical advice for lawyers or compliance officers.
Source
How does this affect you?
Get an AI analysis of this article grounded in your jurisdictions, practice areas, and any policy documents you've uploaded to Wansom.
Finish Reading the Full Story and the Expert Analysis.
Get the latest legal & regulatory intelligence in United States
Wansom is AI and can make mistakes.
