New York Appellate Division: Rules in Tymoshenko v Levitansky 2026 NY Slip Op 05988

• The New York Appellate Division, Second Department, issued a decision in Tymoshenko v. Levitansky on October 14, 2026.
• The case is officially cited as 2026 NY Slip Op 05988, involving Olga Tymoshenko, Oksana Levitansky, and appellant Maria Guerrero.
• The New York State Law Reporting Bureau published the decision under Judiciary Law § 431.
• This ruling is currently uncorrected and subject to revision before its final publication in the Official Reports.
• Legal professionals should review this decision to understand its precedential value within the Second Judicial Department.

Lawyers should carefully examine this recent New York Appellate Division decision to understand its specific holding and assess its precedential value for ongoing or future cases within the Second Judicial Department, particularly if their clients are involved in similar disputes.

The New York Appellate Division, Second Department, recently rendered a significant decision in the case of Tymoshenko v. Levitansky, officially designated as 2026 NY Slip Op 05988. This ruling, handed down on October 14, 2026, involves Olga Tymoshenko, identified as the respondent, against Oksana Levitansky, who is listed among the defendants. Maria Guerrero is specifically named as the appellant in this matter, indicating her role in bringing the appeal before the court.

This decision originates from the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department. Its publication signifies a formal pronouncement from the intermediate appellate court, contributing to the body of New York case law. The specific details of the underlying dispute are not provided, but the procedural posture clearly establishes the parties' roles in the appellate process.

The publication of this decision, 2026 NY Slip Op 05988, is carried out by the New York State Law Reporting Bureau, a process mandated by Judiciary Law § 431. This statutory requirement ensures that judicial opinions from New York's appellate courts are systematically recorded and made accessible to the legal community and the public. The 'NY Slip Op' designation is a temporary citation assigned to decisions upon their initial release, preceding their final placement in the Official Reports.

It is crucial for legal practitioners to note that, as explicitly stated, this decision is currently 'uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.' This caveat means that while the ruling in Olga Tymoshenko v Oksana Levitansky is public, minor textual changes, such as typographical errors or formatting adjustments, may still occur. However, the substantive legal findings and the court's judgment are generally considered final at this stage, providing immediate guidance on the legal principles applied by the New York Appellate Division Second Department.

The October 14 2026 decision in Tymoshenko v. Levitansky carries precedential weight within the Second Judicial Department, making its review essential for legal professionals. Lawyers should carefully examine this recent New York Appellate Division decision to understand its specific holding and assess its precedential value for ongoing or future cases within the Second Judicial Department, particularly if their clients are involved in similar disputes. The involvement of Maria Guerrero as an appellant underscores the contentious nature of the issues brought before the appellate bench.

Monitoring decisions like 2026 NY Slip Op 05988 is a critical aspect of legal practice, as they shape the interpretation and application of law in the state. Even with the advisory that the decision is subject to revision, its immediate publication signals its importance and provides insight into the current legal landscape. The specific roles of Olga Tymoshenko as respondent and Oksana Levitansky as a defendant further define the scope of the appellate review, offering valuable context for those navigating similar legal challenges.

Lawyers should review this recent New York Appellate Division decision to understand its specific holding and assess its precedential value for ongoing or future cases within the Second Judicial Department, particularly if their clients are involved in similar disputes.

Source: Original reporting via New York State Law Reporting Bureau