Mississippi Court of Appeals: Maurice Gray Files 2025-CP-00969-COA Mississippi Appeal

• Case 2025-CP-00969-COA, titled *Maurice Lorenzo Gray a/k/a Maurice Gray v. State of Mississippi*, is currently before the Mississippi Court of Appeals.
• Maurice Lorenzo Gray is the appellant, challenging a judgment issued by the Bolivar County Circuit Court on July 15, 2025.
• The original trial proceedings were presided over by the Honorable William Hunter Nowell.
• The provided information constitutes only the header of a court opinion, lacking any substantive legal findings or reasoning.

Crucially, this introductory material does not contain any of the legal reasoning, factual findings, or ultimate rulings that would typically comprise the body of a full Mississippi Court of Appeals opinion.

A new appellate case, identified by the number 2025-CP-00969-COA, has been docketed within the Mississippi judicial system. This particular matter, titled *Maurice Lorenzo Gray a/k/a Maurice Gray v. State of Mississippi*, is currently before the Court of Appeals of the State of Mississippi. The appellant in this proceeding is Maurice Lorenzo Gray, who is also known by the alias Maurice Gray, indicating a potential criminal or post-conviction relief context where such identification is common. The State of Mississippi is listed as the appellee, signifying its role as the responding party in the appeal.

This filing marks the formal entry of the case into the appellate court's records, establishing its unique identifier and the primary parties involved. The designation "COA" within the case number explicitly confirms its status as a matter before the Court of Appeals, distinguishing it from cases heard by the Supreme Court or other state tribunals. The inclusion of the appellant's alternate name ensures clear identification across all legal documents pertaining to this specific individual and case.

The presence of both an appellant and an appellee confirms that this is an adversarial proceeding, typical of appeals where one party seeks to overturn or modify a decision rendered by a lower court. The case name, *Maurice Lorenzo Gray v. State of Mississippi*, provides the foundational identification for anyone tracking legal developments in Mississippi's appellate courts, particularly concerning criminal or post-conviction matters where the state is frequently a party.

The appellate review initiated by Maurice Lorenzo Gray stems from a prior judicial proceeding in the Bolivar County Circuit Court. This lower court rendered its judgment on July 15, 2025, which serves as the foundational decision now being challenged on appeal. The judicial officer presiding over the original trial court proceedings was the Honorable William Hunter Nowell, whose name is recorded as the trial judge in this matter.

The designation of the Bolivar County Circuit Court as the originating jurisdiction is crucial, as it pinpoints the geographical and jurisdictional context of the initial legal dispute. Circuit courts in Mississippi handle a broad range of cases, including major civil disputes and felony criminal cases, suggesting the nature of the underlying judgment that Maurice Lorenzo Gray is appealing. The specific date of judgment, July 15, 2025, is a key procedural detail, marking the official conclusion of the trial court's involvement and the commencement of the period during which an appeal could be filed.

Judge William Hunter Nowell's role as the trial judge means he presided over the proceedings that led to the judgment now under scrutiny by the Mississippi Court of Appeals. His identification is standard practice in appellate filings, providing a complete record of the judicial history of the case. This information collectively establishes the procedural pathway of the case, from its initial resolution in Bolivar County to its current status before the appellate bench.

It is important to recognize that the details provided for case 2025-CP-00969-COA Mississippi constitute only the header or introductory portion of a court opinion. This segment of the document serves primarily as an identification label, offering essential metadata about the case rather than its substantive legal content. It explicitly lists the court, the case number, the parties involved, the date of the trial court's judgment, and the name of the presiding trial judge.

Crucially, this introductory material does not contain any of the legal reasoning, factual findings, or ultimate rulings that would typically comprise the body of a full Mississippi Court of Appeals opinion. There are no discussions of legal precedents, statutory interpretations, or the application of law to specific facts. The document, in its current form, does not articulate the issues presented on appeal, the arguments made by either Maurice Lorenzo Gray or the State of Mississippi, or the appellate court's decision regarding those arguments.

Therefore, while it provides a clear and concise summary of the case's identifying characteristics, it offers no insight into the legal merits of the appeal or the outcome of the appellate review. For legal professionals or interested parties, this information is valuable for tracking the existence and procedural status of the case but does not convey any actionable legal findings or precedential value. It is merely the administrative framework upon which a full legal opinion would be built.

This article is merely the header of a court opinion, providing the case name, number, and court details. It does not contain any substantive legal findings, rulings, or reasoning, and therefore offers no actionable legal implication for a lawyer or compliance officer beyond identifying that this case exists.

Source: Original reporting via court document header