Florida Fourth DCA: Pappachristou v Pappachristou Florida 4D22-0836 Appeal

• An appeal titled Marcelita Apostol Pappachristou v. Gary Pappachristou is currently before the Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal.
• The case, identified as No. 4D2025-0836, has a recorded date of September 24, 2026.
• Marcelita Apostol Pappachristou is the appellant, while Gary Pappachristou is the appellee in this Florida appeal.
• The appeal originates from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County, where Judge Karen presided.
• The available information identifies the parties, courts, and case number but does not disclose the legal issues or outcome of the appeal.

The provided details establish the case's procedural posture within the Florida judicial system but offer no insight into the substantive legal questions or the court's ultimate decision.

An appeal involving Marcelita Apostol Pappachristou and Gary Pappachristou is currently on the docket of the District Court of Appeal of the State of Florida, Fourth District. This specific Florida appellate case, bearing the number 4D2025-0836, lists Marcelita Apostol Pappachristou as the appellant and Gary Pappachristou as the appellee. The record indicates a date of September 24, 2026, which typically signifies the date of a decision, filing, or other significant procedural event in the appellate process.

The proceedings originated from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, which serves Palm Beach County. The lower court judge identified in connection with this appeal is Judge Karen. This foundational information establishes the basic framework of the legal dispute, identifying the parties involved, the specific appellate court reviewing the matter, and the trial court from which the appeal arose, along with its unique identifier and a key date.

The Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal operates as an intermediate appellate court within the state's judicial hierarchy. Its primary function is to review decisions made by lower trial courts, such as the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County, to ensure that legal errors have not occurred. These district courts of appeal are crucial components of Florida's legal system, handling a wide array of civil and criminal appeals from the circuit courts within their designated geographical areas.

Appeals to this court, including Marcelita Apostol Pappachristou v. Gary Pappachristou, No. 4D2025-0836, typically involve a party seeking to overturn a judgment or order from the trial court, arguing that the lower court made a mistake of law or procedure. The Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, from which this appeal emanates, is a trial court of general jurisdiction, handling a broad spectrum of cases before they might proceed to the appellate level. The provided details establish the case's procedural posture within the Florida judicial system but offer no insight into the substantive legal questions or the court's ultimate decision.

Decisions rendered by the Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal contribute significantly to Florida appellate case law, shaping legal interpretations and setting precedents for future cases within its jurisdiction. Each published opinion from this court can influence how similar legal issues are adjudicated in trial courts and subsequent appeals. However, for the case of Marcelita Apostol Pappachristou v. Gary Pappachristou, No. 4D2025-0836, the specific impact on Florida appellate case law remains undetermined.

Without access to the full appellate opinion, the precise legal issues that were appealed, the arguments presented by the appellant and appellee, the court's reasoning, or the ultimate outcome of the appeal are not discernible. The currently available information functions primarily as a formal docket entry, confirming the existence and basic identification of an ongoing or recently concluded appellate proceeding. Therefore, while the case is part of the broader Florida appellate landscape, its specific contribution to legal precedent cannot be assessed from these limited details.

This article provides only the case caption and court information for an appeal. Without the full opinion or further details regarding the legal issues or holding, there is no practical implication or actionable insight for a lawyer or compliance officer.

Source: Information derived from court records