DR Congo C64: Conference of Presidents Demands Release of Arrested Members

The Conference of Presidents of the Coalition Article 64 (C64), in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo, on Wednesday, October 28, 2026, reaffirmed its role as the decision-making body of the platform, rejecting any mediation between Félix Tshisekedi and Joseph Kabila.

This internal political development within a significant civil society coalition has implications for the DRC's political landscape and rule of law. The Conference of Presidents publicly asserted its authority over the Présidium, calling for adherence to the coalition's founding texts and governance mechanisms, particularly the "Pacte de confiance." Crucially, it rejected any initiative for mediation between President Félix Tshisekedi and former President Joseph Kabila, stating that the C64's primary mission is to defend constitutional order and democratic gains. This signals a hardening of positions and potentially limits avenues for political dialogue, which could impact stability. The outcome of the demand for release is not yet reported.

The C64 also demanded the immediate and unconditional release of three of its arrested members: Marley Vuvu, Prince Epenge, and Stéphane Shiso. This demand raises concerns about due process, freedom of association, and the treatment of political activists, which are fundamental aspects of constitutional law and human rights in the DRC. For practitioners, it highlights the ongoing challenges to democratic governance and the potential for political tensions to manifest in legal actions or human rights concerns.

The legal context primarily involves the constitutional framework of the DRC, particularly provisions related to freedom of association, political expression, and due process rights for arrested individuals. The C64's internal "Pacte de confiance" serves as its foundational document, governing its internal operations. The mention of "constitutional order" and "democratic gains" refers to the principles enshrined in the DRC's Constitution. The demand for the release of members implicates criminal procedure laws and the role of the judiciary in upholding individual liberties against potential political interference.

Attorneys advising political organizations, civil society groups, or individuals involved in political activism in the DRC should closely monitor the enforcement of constitutional rights, particularly regarding freedom of assembly and expression, and due process for arrested individuals. Businesses should be aware that political instability or perceived erosion of the rule of law, as suggested by concerns over "justice à deux vitesses," can impact the investment climate and operational risks. Monitoring the judicial proceedings concerning the arrested C64 members will provide insights into the independence and impartiality of the DRC's justice system.