
Uttarakhand Bar Council Members Move Supreme Court Against BCI's Women's Quota Implementat
Ten elected members of the Uttarakhand Bar Council have moved the Supreme Court challenging a July 2026 resolution and circular issued by the Bar Council of India (BCI) which deal with how court-ordered representation of women in State Bar Councils is to be implemented [Kuldeep Kumar and Ors. Vs Union of India & Anr.].The petitioners have contended that the BCI's approach amounts to illegally altering the composition of State Bar Councils.The circular proposed increasing the strength of State Bar Councils where an insufficient number of women were elected, by adding additional seats to comply with the Supreme Court-mandated 30 per cent representation for women.According to the petitioners, this amounts to unlawfully expanding the Council to secure women's representation despite there being no legal amendment or specific direction from the Supreme Court permitting such an increase. A Bench of Chief Justice Surya Kant, Justice Joymalya Bagchi and Justice V Mohana on Tuesday sought a response from the Bar Council of India (BCI) and the Union Ministry of Law and Justice in the matter. Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V MohanaThe elections to member positions of the Bar Council of Uttarakhand was held in February this year. Meanwhile, the Supreme Court had passed an order in Yogamaya MG v. Union of India & Ors, directing that 30 percent of positions in State Bar Councils must be occupied by women.To implement this directive, the BCI
How does this affect your business?
Get an AI analysis of this article grounded in your jurisdictions, practice areas, and any policy documents you've uploaded to Wansom.
Wansom is AI and can make mistakes.
