Eleventh Circuit: United States v. Richardson Bien Aime Document Not For Publication

• A document (32-1) in the case of United States v. Richardson Bien Aime was filed with the Eleventh Circuit on September 3, 2026.
• The case, identified as No. 25-13556, is assigned to the court's Non-Argument Calendar.
• The filing is explicitly marked as "NOT FOR PUBLICATION," indicating its limited precedential value.
• The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit reviews federal cases from Alabama, Florida, and Georgia.

Crucially, the document filed in United States v. Richardson Bien Aime is explicitly marked as "NOT FOR PUBLICATION."

A specific document, identified as Document 32-1, was filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit on September 3, 2026. This filing pertains to the case of United States v. Richardson Bien Aime, which carries the appellate case number 25-13556. The document itself is marked as page 1 of a total of 5 pages.

This particular filing is designated for the court's Non-Argument Calendar, indicating that the Eleventh Circuit intends to resolve the matter without the need for oral arguments from the parties involved. Such a designation is typically applied to cases where the legal issues are deemed straightforward or sufficiently addressed by written briefs, allowing for a more expedited review process by the appellate judges.

The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit serves as a federal appellate court with jurisdiction over federal cases originating from the district courts in Alabama, Florida, and Georgia. As an intermediate appellate court, it reviews decisions made by lower federal courts within its geographical purview, ensuring the correct application of law.

Crucially, the document filed in United States v. Richardson Bien Aime is explicitly marked as "NOT FOR PUBLICATION." This designation carries significant weight in federal appellate practice. It means that the court's decision or order, once issued in relation to this document, will not be formally published in the Federal Reporter series, which is the standard repository for precedential federal appellate opinions. This status limits its use as binding precedent in future cases, distinguishing it from published opinions that establish legal principles for the entire circuit.

The "not for publication" status of a judicial document, such as the one filed in United States v. Richardson Bien Aime before the Eleventh Circuit, indicates that the court does not consider its contents to establish new law or to be of significant precedential value. While the ruling or order will resolve the specific dispute between the United States and Richardson Bien Aime, it is not intended to guide or bind other courts in future, similar cases.

This practice allows appellate courts to efficiently manage their caseload by issuing decisions that address the immediate parties' concerns without adding to the body of binding legal precedent. Consequently, legal practitioners and scholars typically do not cite unpublished decisions as authoritative legal precedent, although they may sometimes be referenced for their persuasive value or for factual context in specific circumstances. The designation underscores that the court's focus in this instance is on the particular merits of Case No. 25-13556, rather than on shaping broader legal interpretation.

Source: Original reporting via USCA11 Case: 25-13556 Document: 32-1