Oregon Court of Appeals: State v. Groff Case Identified, Opinion Issued

• The Oregon Court of Appeals is handling an appeal titled State of Oregon v. Michael Allan Groff, identified as case number A188037.
• This appellate case originated from the Lane County Circuit Court, where it was assigned case number 23CR42623 and presided over by Judge Charles M. Zennaché.
• The appeal was formally submitted to the Court of Appeals on July 10, 2026, with an official document dated September 2, 2026, confirming the issuance of a precedential opinion.
• Michael Allan Groff is the defendant-appellant, indicating he is challenging a lower court decision, while the State of Oregon is the plaintiff-respondent.
• The provided information is limited to the case caption and procedural dates, offering no details about the legal issues, facts, or outcome of the appeal.

Without the actual opinion, order, or a summary of the court's reasoning, it is impossible to discern what specific legal questions were presented in the Michael Allan Groff appeal.

The Oregon Court of Appeals has formally identified a case involving the State of Oregon as the plaintiff-respondent and Michael Allan Groff as the defendant-appellant. This appellate matter, officially designated as A188037, stems from an earlier proceeding in the Lane County Circuit Court, which carried the case number 23CR42623. The documentation from the appellate court, bearing the number 818, confirms the progression of this legal dispute to the state's intermediate appellate level.

The initial proceedings for this *Oregon criminal case Groff* were overseen by Judge Charles M. Zennaché in the Lane County Circuit Court. The appeal signifies that a decision rendered at the circuit court level was contested by Michael Allan Groff, leading to a review by a higher judicial body. The designation of the State of Oregon as the respondent indicates that the state prevailed in the lower court and is now defending that outcome on appeal.

The procedural timeline for this matter indicates that it was formally submitted to the appellate court on July 10, 2026. This submission date typically marks the point at which all briefs have been filed and, if applicable, oral arguments have concluded, rendering the case ready for judicial deliberation. Subsequently, the official document pertaining to the *Michael Allan Groff appeal* was dated September 2, 2026, confirming the issuance of a precedential opinion from the court approximately two months after its submission.

The legal journey for *State v. Groff Oregon Court of Appeals* began in the Lane County Circuit Court, where it was assigned the identifier 23CR42623. This initial phase of the litigation involved the presentation of evidence and arguments before Judge Charles M. Zennaché, culminating in a judgment that prompted the subsequent appeal. The circuit court serves as the primary trial court in Oregon, handling a broad range of civil and criminal matters, including the type of *Oregon criminal case Groff* represents.

Following the circuit court's decision, Michael Allan Groff exercised the right to appeal, bringing the case to the Court of Appeals of the State of Oregon. This transition is marked by the new appellate case number, A188037, which uniquely identifies the matter within the appellate system. The appellate court's role is to review the proceedings of the lower court for legal errors, rather than to conduct a new trial or re-evaluate factual findings.

The formal submission of the case on July 10, 2026, indicates that all necessary paperwork and arguments were presented to the appellate panel for their consideration. The subsequent date of September 2, 2026, on the court document, highlights the conclusion of the appellate review process, at least in terms of a formal filing or issuance related to the *Michael Allan Groff appeal*.

A case caption, such as the one provided for *State v. Groff Oregon Court of Appeals*, serves as the fundamental identifying information for a legal proceeding. It clearly delineates the parties involved—the State of Oregon as the plaintiff-respondent and Michael Allan Groff as the defendant-appellant—and specifies the judicial forums where the case has been heard or is currently pending. These details are essential for tracking the case through the court system and for legal professionals to correctly reference the matter.

While the caption provides crucial administrative data, including the appellate case number A188037 and the underlying circuit court number 23CR42623, it inherently lacks substantive information about the case's merits. It identifies Judge Charles M. Zennaché as the presiding judge at the circuit court level, but it does not reveal the specific charges, the factual circumstances that led to the appeal, or the legal questions being addressed by the appellate court. The document number 818 further confirms its official status within the court's records.

Therefore, although the existence of this *Oregon criminal case Groff* is unequivocally established, the caption alone does not offer any insight into the legal arguments made, the court's reasoning, or the ultimate outcome of the appeal. It functions as a directory entry, pointing to the case's location within the judicial hierarchy and its participants, but not its content.

For legal practitioners and researchers, the information currently available for *State v. Groff Oregon Court of Appeals* is limited to its identifying details, offering no basis for substantive legal analysis. While the case name, party designations, and court identifiers like *Oregon A188037* and *23CR42623* are critical for administrative purposes, they do not provide the context necessary to understand the legal issues at stake or the implications of any ruling.

Without the actual opinion, order, or a summary of the court's reasoning, it is impossible to discern what specific legal questions were presented in the *Michael Allan Groff appeal*. This means that the factual background, the legal precedents cited, and the court's decision on any points of law remain unknown. The document dated September 2, 2026, merely confirms the issuance of some official communication, but its content is not disclosed.

Consequently, while the existence of this *Oregon criminal case Groff* is confirmed, any attempt to derive practical legal implications or offer actionable advice based solely on this caption would be speculative. The provided information serves primarily as a record of the case's existence and its progression through the Oregon judicial system, awaiting the release of the full court document for any meaningful legal interpretation.

This article provides only the case caption for State v. Groff, including the court, parties, and case numbers. Without the actual opinion or details of the ruling, there is no practical legal implication or actionable advice for a lawyer or compliance officer.

Source: Original reporting via court document