Florida Second DCA: Appeal Noted in Saxon v. Bay Ranch Mobile Village 2026

• An appeal, Saxon v. Bay Ranch Mobile Village, LLP, was noted by the Florida Second District Court of Appeal on November 6, 2026.
• Andrew Calhoun Saxon is identified as the appellant, with Bay Ranch Mobile Village, LLP, doing business as Bay Ranch Mobile Home Park, as the appellee.
• The case is formally docketed under the number 2D2026-1143.
• The appeal proceeds pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130, which governs appeals of non-final orders.
• Only basic citation information is available, offering no details on the underlying legal issues or the court's reasoning.

For legal practitioners or compliance officers, this basic information offers no actionable legal guidance or practical implications.

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal recently acknowledged an appeal in the case of Saxon v. Bay Ranch Mobile Village, LLP. This appellate action, formally docketed under case number 2D2026-1143, involves Andrew Calhoun Saxon as the appellant, challenging a prior decision. The appellee in this proceeding is Bay Ranch Mobile Village, LLP, which operates under the designation Bay Ranch Mobile Home Park.

The court officially noted this appeal on November 6, 2026. This filing marks a significant procedural step in the ongoing legal dispute between the parties, bringing the matter before a higher judicial authority for review. The specific details of the lower court's ruling that prompted this appeal are not available from the initial filing information, nor are the precise arguments being advanced by either side.

The appeal in Saxon v. Bay Ranch Mobile Village, LLP, was initiated pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130. This particular rule governs appeals of non-final orders, often referred to as interlocutory appeals. Unlike appeals from final judgments that conclude an entire case, Rule 9.130 permits appellate review of certain types of orders before the trial court has rendered a complete and final decision on all aspects of the litigation.

Such orders typically address specific, discrete issues that, if left unreviewed, could cause irreparable harm or significantly impact the course of the proceedings. For instance, these might include orders granting or denying injunctions, determining jurisdiction, or ruling on class certification. The invocation of Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 indicates that the appellant, Andrew Calhoun Saxon, is seeking immediate appellate intervention on a specific, non-final ruling from a lower court, rather than waiting for the entire case to be resolved. However, the exact nature of the non-final order being challenged in this specific instance of Saxon v. Bay Ranch Mobile Village 2026 remains undisclosed in the available public record.

While the existence of an appeal in Saxon v. Bay Ranch Mobile Village, LLP, is now a matter of public record, the current information provides only the most fundamental citation details. The filing date of November 6, 2026, and the case number 2D2026-1143 confirm the procedural status of the case before the Florida Second District Court of Appeal. However, the absence of the full appellate opinion or any accompanying court documents means that the substantive legal issues, the specific facts giving rise to the dispute, and the reasoning behind the lower court's decision are not yet known.

For legal practitioners or compliance officers, this basic information offers no actionable legal guidance or practical implications. Without access to the court's full reasoning, the arguments presented by Andrew Calhoun Saxon, or the response from Bay Ranch Mobile Village, LLP d/b/a Bay Ranch Mobile Home Park, it is impossible to discern any new legal precedents, interpret the application of existing law, or understand the potential impact on similar cases. The mere fact of an appeal under Fla. R. App. P. 9.130, while procedurally significant, does not, by itself, convey any substantive legal insights.

This article provides only the basic citation information for an appeal. Without the full opinion, there is no actionable legal angle or practical implication for a lawyer or compliance officer.

Source: Original reporting via Florida Second District Court of Appeal filing