Legal News

Rwanda: Budget Oversight Falls Short in Key Areas, Survey Finds

Rwanda·Wire Summary⏱️ 4 min read

The government has made progress in opening up its budget process, but the latest Open Budget Survey (OBS) shows that gains have been uneven, with public participation still low, parliamentary oversight below its 2017 level and some key budget documents becoming less comprehensive. The OBS, produced by the International Budget Partnership (IBP), is the world's only independent, comparative assessment of budget transparency, public participation and oversight. The 2025 survey covers 82 countries and is based on assessments by independent budget researchers in each country. Also read: Rwanda registers progress in budget transparency -- survey Follow us on WhatsApp | LinkedIn for the latest headlines In Rwanda, the draft questionnaire was reviewed by a representative of the Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning (MINECOFIN). The findings were presented in Kigali on August 14 by Transparency International Rwanda. The survey assesses documents, events and developments that took place up to December 31, 2024. Rwanda scored 55 out of 100 on the Open Budget Index, up from 50 in 2023. Here are five areas highlighted by the survey that need attention: 1. Public participation remains low Rwanda's public participation score has improved, but it remains the weakest of the three budget accountability pillars. The score rose from 13 in 2017 to 15 in 2019, remained at 15 in 2021, increased to 16 in 2023 and then jumped to 26 in 2025. The 10-point increase between 2023 and 2025 is the biggest single-round improvement Rwanda has recorded on this pillar. However, the survey says the improvement was concentrated almost entirely in mechanisms operated by MINECOFIN and districts. The legislature and the Office of the Auditor General each scored zero on their public participation indicators. The survey found no public-facing participation mechanism through Parliament at any stage of the budget process, while the supreme audit institution had no mechanism for the public to shape or contribute to its audit programme. ALSO READ: Rwanda among most improved in global rankings on budget accountability The survey recommends expanding opportunities during budget implementation for citizens and civil society organisations to monitor budget execution and provide input on the delivery of public services and government programmes. 2. Parliamentary oversight has weakened Rwanda's combined budget oversight score rose from 56 in 2023 to 61 in 2025, but the overall figure masks a significant difference between legislative and audit oversight. Legislative oversight stood at 64 in 2017, fell to 61 in 2019 and 2021, dropped to 44 in 2023 and recovered slightly to 47 in 2025. This leaves the score 17 points below its 2017 level. The survey indicates that the decline is concentrated in committee reporting and the timing of budget submission and approval, rather than being linked to a single event. It recommends that parliamentary committees examine the Executive's Budget Proposal and publish their analysis online. It also calls for a legislative committee to examine in-year budget implementation and publish reports on its findings. Also read : Rwanda implements comprehensive reforms to enhance transparency 3.Audit oversight rises but public participation still low The picture is different when it comes to audit oversight. The score rose from 50 in 2017 to 89 in 2025, a gain of 39 points. It stood at 72 in 2019 and 2021 and increased to 78 in 2023. The OBS attributes the strong performance partly to the independence and budget autonomy of the Auditor General, as well as consistent attendance at legislative hearings. However, strong audit oversight has not been matched by public participation in the audit process. The Office of the Auditor General scored zero on the three indicators assessing public participation, with the survey finding no mechanism for citizens to shape or contribute to the audit programme. The survey recommends formal mechanisms through which citize

Get Deeper AI analysis

How does this affect you?

Get an AI analysis of this article grounded in your jurisdictions, practice areas, and any policy documents you've uploaded to Wansom.

Wansom is AI and can make mistakes.