Rajasthan HC: Sharma Denies Mehta Allegations, Calls Them Baseless

• Rajasthan High Court former Acting Chief Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma has publicly denied allegations of administrative misconduct.
• Supreme Court Justice Sandeep Mehta accused Justice Sharma of manipulating case listings and misusing administrative powers.
• Justice Mehta conveyed his concerns to the Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and advocated for an immediate appointment of a Chief Justice from outside the state.
• Justice Sharma stated the allegations were baseless, false, and stemmed from resentment, confirming he provided supporting evidence to CJI Surya Kant.
• He expressed full faith in the Indian judicial system and plans to address the media personally once approved by the CJI. The Supreme Court Collegium has since recommended Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal as the new Chief Justice of the Rajasthan High Court.

Breaking his silence on the unfolding controversy, Rajasthan High Court former Acting Chief Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma issued a public statement to the media, firmly denying the accusations.

The administrative integrity of the Rajasthan High Court has come under scrutiny following serious allegations leveled against its former Acting Chief Justice, Sanjeev Prakash Sharma. These claims, made by Supreme Court Justice Sandeep Mehta, specifically point to alleged manipulation of case listings and a misuse of administrative powers within the High Court. The gravity of these accusations has prompted significant attention within legal circles.

Justice Mehta did not keep his concerns private, instead escalating the matter directly to the highest judicial authority in the country. He formally communicated his allegations in letters addressed to the Chief Justice of India Surya Kant. Furthermore, Justice Mehta explicitly called for a swift intervention, advocating for the immediate appointment of a Chief Justice from another state to oversee the Rajasthan High Court, suggesting a need for external oversight to address the issues he raised.

Breaking his silence on the unfolding controversy, Rajasthan High Court former Acting Chief Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma issued a public statement to the media, firmly denying the accusations. In his statement, originally released in Hindi, Justice Sharma unequivocally refuted all allegations, labeling them as baseless, false, and factually incorrect. He further asserted that Justice Sandeep Mehta's claims were motivated by "resentment." This direct rebuttal from Justice Sharma aims to address the growing concerns surrounding the court's operations.

Justice Sharma has also confirmed that he has directly communicated his position to Chief Justice of India Surya Kant. He stated that he provided supporting evidence to the CJI to substantiate his refutation of the allegations. While the **Rajasthan HC Sharma denies Mehta allegations** emphatically, he had indicated a willingness to engage further with the public. Justice Sharma expressed his "full faith in the Indian judicial system" and pledged to personally appear before the media to present his side of the story once he receives approval from the Chief Justice of India, requesting patience until that time. The Supreme Court Collegium has since recommended Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal as the new Chief Justice of the Rajasthan High Court.

The internal dispute within the Rajasthan High Court, particularly concerning allegations of administrative misconduct and case listing manipulation, raises significant questions about judicial governance and transparency. The call by Justice Sandeep Mehta for a Chief Justice from another state to be appointed immediately underscores potential **Indian judiciary integrity concerns** when such serious claims emerge from within the system. The administrative powers wielded by an Acting Chief Justice in India are substantial, encompassing crucial decisions regarding court functioning and case allocation, making any alleged misuse a matter of profound importance.

This situation highlights the critical role of oversight mechanisms within the judiciary and the importance of maintaining public trust in the impartiality of court proceedings. While former Acting Chief Justice Sharma has vehemently denied the claims, providing his explanation and evidence to CJI Surya Kant, the very existence of such allegations, particularly those related to **Rajasthan High Court case listing manipulation**, necessitates a thorough and transparent process to uphold the judiciary's reputation. The resolution of this matter will be closely watched as a benchmark for how internal challenges to judicial integrity are addressed at the highest levels, especially with the recommendation of Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal as the new Chief Justice.

This article details an internal dispute within the Rajasthan High Court regarding administrative integrity. While not directly impacting legal procedures or client advice, it serves as a critical watch point for lawyers monitoring judicial governance and transparency in India.

Source: Reporting from legal sources