Kentucky Court of Appeals: Placido Perez-Hernandez v Commonwealth Kentucky Decision Published

• Placido Perez-Hernandez has appealed a decision from the Logan Circuit Court to the Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals.
• The appeal is officially identified as 2024-CA-1461-MR, stemming from an original case numbered 22-CR-00232.
• The Honorable Joe W. Hendricks, Jr. presided over the initial proceedings in the Logan Circuit Court.
• The Kentucky Court of Appeals rendered its decision in this case on November 6, 2026, at 10:00 A.M.
• This appellate decision is designated "To Be Published," indicating its significance as legal precedent.

The directive that the appellate court's decision is "To Be Published" carries substantial implications for legal practice and precedent across Kentucky.

Placido Perez-Hernandez has initiated an appeal before the Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals, seeking a review of a prior judicial decision. This appellate action is formally documented under the case number 2024-CA-1461-MR. Mr. Perez-Hernandez, identified as the appellant, is challenging a ruling that originated from the Logan Circuit Court, where the initial proceedings took place.

The Commonwealth of Kentucky stands as the appellee in this appellate proceeding, defending the judgment rendered by the lower court. The original case, which forms the basis of this appeal, was assigned the action number 22-CR-00232 within the Logan Circuit Court system. This designation typically points to a criminal matter that progressed through the trial court before being elevated for appellate scrutiny.

The Honorable Joe W. Hendricks, Jr. presided over the initial judicial process in the Logan Circuit Court. His determination in the 22-CR-00232 action is now the subject of Placido Perez-Hernandez's appeal, indicating a desire for the higher court to re-examine the legal and procedural aspects of the original trial. The appellate mechanism provides a critical avenue for parties to seek redress and ensure the proper application of law.

The case, officially titled Placido Perez-Hernandez v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, is being heard by the Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals. This judicial body functions as an intermediate appellate court within the state's legal structure, primarily responsible for reviewing decisions issued by circuit courts across Kentucky. The specific identifier for this particular appeal within the court's docket is 2024-CA-1461-MR.

A definitive decision in this matter was formally rendered on November 6, 2026, at precisely 10:00 A.M. This timestamp signifies the official moment the appellate court's judgment was finalized and released. Crucially, the decision has also been marked "To Be Published," a designation that elevates its status within the legal community.

The directive that the appellate court's decision is "To Be Published" carries substantial implications for legal practice and precedent across Kentucky. Unlike opinions designated as "unpublished," which generally possess limited precedential value and restrictions on their citation, a published opinion serves as authoritative guidance. This means the legal interpretations and principles articulated in Placido Perez-Hernandez v. Commonwealth of Kentucky will become an integral part of Kentucky's common law.

For attorneys, judges, and other legal professionals throughout the Commonwealth, published decisions from the Kentucky Court of Appeals are essential resources. They clarify how specific statutes and legal doctrines should be understood and applied in future cases. The rendering of this significant decision on November 6, 2026, therefore, extends beyond merely resolving the dispute between Mr. Perez-Hernandez and the Commonwealth; it actively shapes the legal landscape by establishing benchmarks for similar legal questions that may arise in the future. The rigorous review process undertaken by the appellate panel, culminating in a published opinion, reinforces the judiciary's vital role in ensuring consistency and fairness in the application of law.

This snippet is merely the header of a court opinion and does not contain sufficient information to derive a practical implication or actionable legal angle for a lawyer or compliance officer.

Source: Original reporting via Kentucky Court of Appeals document.