Florida 2nd DCA: Perdue v. Domicilium Charleston Borrower LLC Ruling

• Robert Perdue, as the appellant, brought an appeal against Sam Domicilium Charleston Borrower LLC.
• The Florida Second District Court of Appeal issued a decision in the case on October 23, 2026.
• The appellate case is identified by the number 2D2025-2548.
• This appeal originated from a prior ruling by the Circuit Court for Pinellas.
• Sam Domicilium Charleston Borrower LLC was previously known as Sam Domicilium Charleston Equity LLC.

While the specific legal issues adjudicated in *Perdue v. Domicilium Charleston Borrower LLC* are not detailed in the available record, every ruling from a district court of appeal contributes to the evolving landscape of Florida jurisprudence.

Robert Perdue has brought an appeal before the Florida Second District Court of Appeal, challenging a prior decision. This case, identified by the number 2D2025-2548, features Perdue as the appellant, seeking to overturn a previous ruling. The opposing party, designated as the appellee, is Sam Domicilium Charleston Borrower LLC. This appellate proceeding marks a significant step in the legal dispute between these entities.

The appellate court rendered its decision on October 23, 2026. This ruling stems from an initial judgment or order issued by the Circuit Court for Pinellas, indicating that the matter has progressed through the state's judicial hierarchy. The transition from a circuit court to a district court of appeal signifies a party's dissatisfaction with the lower court's outcome and their pursuit of a higher judicial review.

The involvement of an individual, Robert Perdue, against a corporate entity, Sam Domicilium Charleston Borrower LLC, suggests a dispute that could encompass various areas of law, though the specific nature of the original claim remains undisclosed. The corporate appellee's name change from Sam Domicilium Charleston Equity LLC to Sam Domicilium Charleston Borrower LLC is also a recorded detail of the case, reflecting a potential corporate restructuring or rebranding during the litigation.

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal serves as an intermediate appellate tribunal within the state's judicial system. Its primary function is to review decisions made by lower trial courts, such as the Circuit Court for Pinellas, to ensure that legal errors were not committed and that justice was properly administered. This court does not conduct new trials or hear new evidence but rather examines the record of the proceedings below for legal sufficiency and procedural correctness.

In this context, Robert Perdue, as the appellant, is the party who lost in the Circuit Court for Pinellas and is now seeking to overturn that decision. Sam Domicilium Charleston Borrower LLC, as the appellee, is defending the lower court's ruling and arguing for its affirmation. The appellate court's review is typically focused on questions of law, such as whether the trial court correctly applied statutes or legal precedents, rather than re-evaluating factual determinations made by the trial court.

The case number, 2D2025-2548, provides a unique identifier for this specific legal action within the Florida Second District Court of Appeal's docket. The "2D" prefix indicates its origin from the Second District, while the subsequent numbers denote the year and sequence of filing, offering a clear reference point for legal professionals and researchers tracking the case. This structured numbering system is standard across Florida's appellate courts.

While the specific legal issues adjudicated in *Perdue v. Domicilium Charleston Borrower LLC* are not detailed in the available record, every ruling from a district court of appeal contributes to the evolving landscape of Florida jurisprudence. These decisions can establish precedents that guide future legal interpretations and applications within the Second District's jurisdiction. The absence of the full opinion means the precise impact on specific areas of law cannot yet be assessed, but the case itself is now part of the public legal record.

The fact that a case reached this level of review underscores the importance of the underlying dispute to the parties involved. For Robert Perdue, the appeal represents an attempt to secure a different legal outcome, potentially seeking relief from an adverse judgment. Conversely, for Sam Domicilium Charleston Borrower LLC, it is an effort to uphold a favorable judgment and maintain the status quo established by the lower court. The resolution of such appeals can have direct consequences for the financial or operational interests of the litigants.

The decision date of October 23, 2026, places this case in a future timeline, highlighting that the legal system continues to process and resolve disputes well into the coming years. This specific date confirms when the Florida Second District Court of Appeal formally issued its determination in the matter identified as No. 2D2025-2548, concluding this stage of the litigation between Robert Perdue and Sam Domicilium Charleston Borrower LLC.

The provided article snippet only contains the case name, parties, court, and case number. Without the actual opinion or details of the legal issues decided, it is not possible to identify a practical implication for lawyers or compliance officers.

Source: Details sourced from Florida appellate court records.