NPP Ho Office Fence Demolition: NDC Blamed For Political Targeting

• The NPP accused the NDC of deliberately orchestrating the demolition of its Ho regional office fence, viewing it as a politically motivated act.
• The NDC countered that the demolition was part of a broader exercise to clear structures within a road reservation for the Government’s Big Push infrastructure programme.
• The NDC claimed the NPP fence was marked for removal since the previous year, with the Ho Municipal Assembly reportedly communicating this to NPP leadership and the MCE attempting engagement.
• Other structures, including parts of the AME Zion Church and private properties, were also removed in the same exercise, according to the NDC.
• The dispute centers on whether the demolition was a legitimate infrastructure intervention or a targeted political action against the opposition party.

This incident underscores the intricate balance between public infrastructure development and the protection of private property rights, particularly when political entities are involved.

A significant political dispute has erupted in Ho following the demolition of a fence wall belonging to the New Patriotic Party (NPP) Regional Office. James Geh, the Communications Officer for the NPP's Ho Central Constituency, has publicly accused the National Democratic Congress (NDC) of orchestrating a deliberate campaign to target the NPP's facilities in the area. This incident, which occurred near the Ho Sports Stadium, has become a focal point of contention, particularly as it precedes the 2025 National Farmers’ Day celebrations.

Mr. Geh articulated the NPP's stance, acknowledging the necessity of infrastructure development but asserting that the recent action was intentionally directed at his party. He further indicated that should the NPP return to power, it plans to undertake its own substantial infrastructure projects, including a proposed dual-carriage road extending from Noguera Junction through the Ho Technical University area. The demolition of the NPP Ho office fence has thus been framed by the party as a politically motivated act rather than a standard municipal engineering undertaking.

In response to the accusations, Sorkpa Kafui Agbleze, the Volta Regional Communications Officer for the NDC, provided an alternative explanation for the demolition. He clarified that the removal of a section of the NPP Regional Office fence wall was part of a broader initiative to clear structures situated within a designated road reservation. This exercise, he stated, is directly linked to ongoing road construction and opening works being carried out under the Government’s extensive Big Push infrastructure programme.

According to a statement issued by the NDC on Friday, September 18, 2026, the demolition was not specifically aimed at the NPP or any political entity. Mr. Agbleze emphasized that the decision to remove structures was based solely on their location within the defined road corridor, irrespective of the owner's political or institutional affiliation. He cited other affected properties, including portions of the AME Zion Church, various private properties, and an old structure located opposite the Guinness premises, to underscore the non-discriminatory nature of the exercise. Furthermore, the NDC asserted that the NPP Regional Office fence had been identified and marked for removal since the previous year, with the Ho Municipal Assembly reportedly communicating this to the NPP Regional leadership and the Ho Municipal Chief Executive attempting to engage them on the matter. Efforts were also made to minimize damage during the NPP Ho office fence demolition, with metal gates and other removable iron works reportedly taken down beforehand.

The conflicting narratives surrounding the NPP Ho office fence demolition highlight the intricate legal and political landscape governing property rights and public infrastructure development in Ghana. The NDC has firmly rejected any suggestions of political victimisation, urging all political parties to refrain from politicizing essential municipal engineering and development works. Their position is that the principle of clearing structures within approved road reservations must be applied uniformly across all entities, whether political parties, religious bodies, private individuals, or other institutions.

This incident underscores the intricate balance between public infrastructure development and the protection of private property rights, particularly when political entities are involved. The core of the dispute centers on whether the demolition should be perceived primarily as a legitimate infrastructure intervention under the Government's Big Push program or as an action specifically targeting an opposition party's facility. The broader context of the NPP NDC Ho political dispute and the application of Volta Region property demolition law remain central to understanding the full implications of this event for property owners and municipal authorities alike.

This incident highlights the legal complexities surrounding property rights and public infrastructure development in Ghana, particularly when political entities are involved. Lawyers should advise clients on the due process for property demolition, rights to notice and compensation, and potential avenues for challenging actions perceived as politically motivated or procedurally flawed by municipal authorities.

Source: Reporting based on Ghana News Agency coverage.