Ninth Circuit: Gillespie-Galindo v Blanche 17-71164 Filed Not For Publication

• The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recorded a case involving Nancy Claraviola Gillespie-Galindo under the number 17-71164.
• This court action was filed or noted on September 24, 2026, by Clerk Molly C. Dwyer.
• The ruling in this case is designated as "not for publication," meaning it does not set legal precedent.
• The document is identified as an "Original document" within the court's records.

The "not for publication" status of the Gillespie-Galindo case, No. 17-71164, means that while the court has rendered a decision, that decision is not intended to be cited as authoritative legal precedent in subsequent litigation.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recorded a filing in the case identified as Nancy Claraviola Gillespie-Galindo, under the case number 17-71164. This action was officially noted by Molly C. Dwyer, who serves as the Clerk for the U.S. Court of Appeals. The document indicates a filing date of September 24, 2026, a detail that stands out given its future temporal placement.

This particular court action is designated as "not for publication," signifying that the resulting opinion or order will not establish binding precedent for future cases within the Ninth Circuit's jurisdiction. The designation is a common practice for appellate courts when a case does not present novel legal questions or when the outcome is determined by a straightforward application of existing law to the facts. The record explicitly identifies this as an "Original document".

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit operates as a federal appellate court, reviewing decisions from U.S. District Courts and certain federal agencies within its vast geographical purview, which includes several western states and territories. As one of the thirteen federal courts of appeals, its rulings are typically binding on lower courts within its circuit, shaping legal interpretation and application across a significant portion of the country.

However, the "not for publication" status of the Gillespie-Galindo case, No. 17-71164, means that while the court has rendered a decision, that decision is not intended to be cited as authoritative legal precedent in subsequent litigation. This practice allows the court to manage its caseload efficiently by issuing rulings that resolve specific disputes between parties without adding to the body of published case law. Molly C. Dwyer, as the Clerk, plays a crucial administrative role in ensuring the proper filing, recording, and dissemination of all court documents, including those marked for non-publication.

For the parties directly involved in the case of Nancy Claraviola Gillespie-Galindo, the court's decision, despite its non-precedential status, provides a resolution to their specific legal dispute. The outcome, though not setting a broader legal standard, definitively addresses the issues raised in the appeal, bringing a measure of finality to the litigation for those directly concerned. The administrative processing of this "Original document" by the Ninth Circuit Clerk, Molly C. Dwyer, on the specified date of September 24, 2026, confirms its official entry into the court's records.

The unusual future date of September 24, 2026, for a filing or issuance, as recorded, suggests an administrative notation or a future event rather than a past action. Regardless of the specific nature of this date, the core facts remain: a federal appellate court has processed a case involving Nancy Claraviola Gillespie-Galindo under number 17-71164, and its resolution is explicitly designated as non-precedential, limiting its impact solely to the immediate parties.

Source: Reporting based on U.S. Court of Appeals filing.