New York Appellate Division: 2026 NY Slip Op 05135 Decision Issued

• The New York State Appellate Division, Third Department, issued a decision in *Matter of Debbra L. v. Jenna L.* on August 27, 2026.
• This ruling, identified as 2026 NY Slip Op 05135, involved Debbra L. as the appellant and Jenna L. et al. as respondents, alongside three other related proceedings.
• The decision, presided over by Justice Christine M. Clark and Justice Pritzker, was published by the New York State Law Reporting Bureau under Judiciary Law § 431.
• It is currently designated as uncorrected and remains subject to revision before its final publication in the Official Reports.

The eventual publication in the Official Reports will solidify the decision's place as binding precedent for lower courts within the Third Department's jurisdiction, and potentially persuasive authority elsewhere.

The New York State Appellate Division, Third Department, recently issued a decision in the case known as *Matter of Debbra L. v. Jenna L.*, officially designated as 2026 NY Slip Op 05135. This ruling, which also encompasses three other related proceedings, was decided and entered on August 27, 2026. The matter involved Debbra L. as the appellant, challenging a prior determination, with Jenna L. and others listed as respondents in the action.

The judicial panel, which included Justice Christine M. Clark and Justice Pritzker, considered the arguments on August 20, 2026, the calendar date for the proceedings. The case carries the identification number CV-25-0685 within the court's records. This decision represents a step in the appellate process for the parties involved, outlining the court's determination on the issues presented.

The decision in *Matter of Debbra L. v. Jenna L.*, identified by its slip opinion number 2026 NY Slip Op 05135, has been published by the New York State Law Reporting Bureau. This bureau operates under the authority granted by Judiciary Law § 431, a statute that mandates the official reporting of judicial decisions across the state. The publication ensures that the court's rulings are made accessible to the legal community and the public, contributing to the body of New York's common law.

It is important to note that, as with many initial appellate pronouncements, this particular decision is currently designated as uncorrected. This status indicates that it remains subject to potential revisions before its final inclusion in the Official Reports. Such revisions typically involve minor typographical errors or formatting adjustments, rather than substantive changes to the court's legal reasoning or outcome. The process ensures the accuracy and integrity of the final published record.

The interim status of the ruling, being 'uncorrected and subject to revision,' highlights a standard procedural step in the New York appellate system. While immediately available for review, the decision's ultimate form for permanent citation will be its version published in the Official Reports. This distinction is crucial for legal practitioners and scholars, as the Official Reports serve as the authoritative source for New York's appellate case law.

The eventual publication in the Official Reports will solidify the decision's place as binding precedent for lower courts within the Third Department's jurisdiction, and potentially persuasive authority elsewhere. The meticulous process overseen by the New York State Law Reporting Bureau, as mandated by Judiciary Law § 431, underscores the state's commitment to maintaining a precise and accessible record of its judicial pronouncements, thereby ensuring consistency and predictability in legal interpretations.

Source: Original reporting via New York State Law Reporting Bureau