
Lagos Court: Restrains Lizzy Anjorin Posting Child Photos
Summary
- A Lagos State High Court has issued an ex parte order restraining actress Lizzy Anjorin from posting photographs of Priscilla Ojo's one-year-old son, Master Rakeem Mkambala.
- The injunction, granted by Justice Yetunde Adesanya on September 2, 2026, also prohibits Anjorin from publishing editorial content about the family on social media platforms.
- The legal action stems from a long-running public dispute between Anjorin and Priscilla Ojo's family, which has included previous defamation suits.
- The order is an interim measure, issued without Anjorin's presence, pending a full hearing on a Motion on Notice.
- Master Rakeem Mkambala, the subject of the injunction, was born in Canada in August 2025.
Lagos Court Imposes Social Media Ban on Actress Anjorin
This comprehensive Lizzy Anjorin social media injunction underscores a judicial commitment to safeguarding personal privacy in the digital realm.
A Lagos State High Court has issued an ex parte order preventing Nollywood actress Elizabeth Lawal, widely known as Lizzy Anjorin, from disseminating images of the one-year-old son of actress Priscilla Ojo and Tanzanian musician Juma Jux. The injunction, handed down by Justice Yetunde Adesanya of the High Court of Lagos State, Lagos Judicial Division, on September 2, 2026, specifically prohibits Anjorin, along with her agents, representatives, or anyone acting on her behalf, from publishing, posting, circulating, uploading, or broadcasting photographs of Master Rakeem Mkambala. This directive applies across various social media platforms, including Instagram, Facebook, WhatsApp, and TikTok.
The legal action, identified as Suit No. LD/ADR/6646/2026, was initiated by Priscilla Ojo, formally known as Mrs. Priscilla Ajoke Ojo Mkambala, her husband Juma Mussa Mkambala, and their son, Master Rakeem Mkambala. The court order meticulously listed several social media accounts allegedly linked to Anjorin, including @lizzyanjorin_originallawal, @lizzyanjorin_original, @lizzyanjorin_legal_mrslawal, @yeyemesho_luxuryfabric1, and a Facebook page named Lizzyanjorin2, as targets for the prohibition. Beyond the child's images, the injunction further restricts Anjorin from broadcasting, publishing, or posting any editorial content concerning the applicants on these same digital platforms. This comprehensive Lizzy Anjorin social media injunction underscores a judicial commitment to safeguarding personal privacy in the digital realm.
Understanding the Ex Parte Order and Its Implications
The order granted by Justice Yetunde Adesanya is an ex parte measure, meaning it was issued without the presence or direct input of Lizzy Anjorin. This procedural approach is characteristic of urgent interim applications where immediate relief is deemed necessary to prevent irreparable harm before all parties can be formally heard. Consequently, the directive serves as a temporary restraint, designed to remain in effect only until a substantive Motion on Notice can be fully heard and determined by the court. This interim nature is a crucial aspect of such injunctions, providing immediate protection while preserving the right to a full hearing later.
Following the issuance of this temporary injunction, the court has mandated that the case file be returned to the Registry of the High Court of Lagos State. This step is for reassignment to the appropriate division, ensuring that the matter proceeds through the correct judicial channels for its subsequent stages. The order itself was officially signed and sealed by the Legal Registrar, Omokhudu-Omahoin Onivenu, and formally issued under the court's authority on September 2, 2026, solidifying its legal standing. This ex parte order Lagos High Court decision highlights the judiciary's capacity for swift action in sensitive cases.
Background to the Dispute and Child Privacy Concerns
This recent court intervention represents the latest development in a protracted public feud that has unfolded over the past two years, primarily on social media, between Lizzy Anjorin and the family of Priscilla Ojo's mother, actress Iyabo Ojo. The history of this dispute includes a previous ₦1 billion defamation lawsuit initiated by Iyabo Ojo against Anjorin, indicating a pattern of contentious interactions between the parties. The current injunction specifically addresses concerns over child privacy social media Nigeria, following Anjorin's recent public statements.
Anjorin had reportedly made unverified claims challenging the parentage of Master Rakeem Mkambala, who was born in Canada in August 2025. While these claims were not independently verified by the reporting source and do not form part of the court order itself, they provide significant context for the legal action taken by Priscilla Ojo and her family. As of the time of the report, Lizzy Anjorin had not publicly commented on the court's decision, leaving the immediate impact of the Priscilla Ojo son's photos court order to unfold. This case underscores the increasing judicial focus on protecting minors from online exposure and harassment, particularly when disputes spill into public digital spaces.
Practical Implications
Lawyers should note the Lagos High Court's willingness to grant ex parte injunctions to protect a child's privacy against social media publication, indicating a robust judicial response to online harassment and the potential for similar relief in cases involving digital content and reputation management.
Source
How does this affect you?
Get an AI analysis of this article grounded in your jurisdictions, practice areas, and any policy documents you've uploaded to Wansom.
Finish Reading the Full Story and the Expert Analysis.
Wansom is AI and can make mistakes.
