Lagos High Court: Interim Order Against Liz Anjorin Over Priscilla Ojo's Son

• The Lagos State High Court has issued an interim order against actress Liz Anjorin.
• The order prohibits Anjorin from publishing photographs of Priscilla Ojo's son, Rakeem Mkambala, and editorial content about Priscilla, her husband, and their son on social media.
• Justice Yetunde Adesanya granted the injunction on September 2, 2026, under Suit No. LD/ADR/6646/2026.
• Anjorin publicly criticized the order's publicisation before formal service, questioning its authenticity.
• This legal development escalates a long-running online dispute between Liz Anjorin and Iyabo Ojo.

This specific social media injunction against Liz Anjorin in Nigeria highlights the legal avenues available for individuals seeking to restrict the dissemination of private or potentially harmful information online.

The Lagos State High Court has issued an interim order against actress Liz Anjorin, prohibiting her from disseminating images of Priscilla Ojo's one-year-old son, Rakeem Mkambala. This judicial directive also extends to any editorial content concerning Priscilla Ojo, her husband Juma Mussa Mkambala, and their child across various social media platforms. The order, which represents a significant development in an ongoing public dispute, was granted following an application filed by Priscilla Ojo, her spouse, and their son.

The court's decision specifically bars Anjorin, along with any agents or representatives acting on her behalf, from publishing, posting, circulating, uploading, or broadcasting photographs of Rakeem Mkambala. This comprehensive restriction covers her social media pages on platforms including Instagram, Facebook, WhatsApp, and TikTok. The interim injunction aims to control the spread of specific content related to the family, pending a full hearing on the substantive application.

Justice Yetunde Adesanya of the Lagos State High Court signed the interim order on Wednesday, September 2, 2026. This legal action, identified under Suit No. LD/ADR/6646/2026, mandates that Anjorin cease all publication and broadcasting of the aforementioned content. The directive explicitly targets several social media accounts allegedly operated by Anjorin, including @lizzyanjorin_originallawal, @lizzyanjorin_original, @lizzyanjorin_legal_mrslawal, and @yeyemesho_luxuryfabric1, alongside a Facebook page named Lizzyanjorin2.

The court's ruling underscores the judiciary's increasing engagement with online content regulation, particularly in cases involving personal privacy and reputation. This specific social media injunction against Liz Anjorin in Nigeria highlights the legal avenues available for individuals seeking to restrict the dissemination of private or potentially harmful information online. The order remains in effect until the Motion on Notice is fully heard and determined by the court.

Following the issuance of the court order, Liz Anjorin publicly reacted during an Instagram Live session held on Friday. She voiced strong skepticism regarding the authenticity and procedural validity of the injunction, particularly criticizing its publicisation before formal service. Anjorin specifically challenged the practice of sharing legal documents on social media, asserting that such an action renders a court case "dead on arrival" if the letter is posted before the intended recipient is officially served.

Anjorin also addressed other claims circulating, stating, "I don’t want to hear that, Lizzy Anjorin locked Priscilla in prison oh," and further condemned the online sharing of legal petitions, remarking, "If nor be madness, posting petition letter on social media." This development adds a formal legal dimension to the long-standing online feud between Anjorin and Priscilla's mother, veteran actress Iyabo Ojo, a dispute that has seen Anjorin make numerous social media posts involving Ojo's family.

The Lagos High Court interim order against Liz Anjorin signifies a notable precedent for the control of social media content within Nigeria's legal landscape. By specifically restraining the publication of images and editorial content related to a minor and his family, the judiciary is demonstrating its readiness to intervene in online disputes that escalate beyond mere public disagreement. This action provides a clear example of how legal mechanisms can be employed to manage digital interactions and protect individual rights.

The public sharing of the certified true copy of the order by Priscilla Ojo on Instagram, and Anjorin's subsequent questioning of this practice, also brings to light procedural considerations surrounding the proper handling and service of court documents in the digital age. This case, therefore, not only impacts the immediate parties involved in the Iyabo Ojo Liz Anjorin legal dispute but also offers valuable insights for legal practitioners and individuals navigating the complexities of social media content restriction in Nigeria.

This development underscores the Nigerian judiciary's readiness to issue interim injunctions to control social media content, offering a precedent for lawyers advising clients on managing online disputes and protecting privacy or reputation. It also highlights procedural considerations regarding the proper publicisation and service of court orders.

Source: Original reporting via Punch Newspapers