IERPP: GoldBod Transparency Law Breach Ghana Alleged Over Reports

• The Institute of Economic Research and Public Policy (IERPP) alleges the Ghana Gold Board (GoldBod) removed quarterly trading reports from its website.
• IERPP issued a statement on August 25, 2026, demanding urgent answers from GoldBod.
• The allegations cite Section 42 of the Ghana Gold Board Act, 2025 (Act 1140), which mandates quarterly report publication.
• These reports are legally required to cover GoldBod's operations, revenue, contracts, expenditure, and responsible sourcing.

The alleged GoldBod quarterly reports removal directly contravenes these clear legal requirements, prompting the IERPP Ghana Gold Board allegations.

The Ghana Gold Board (GoldBod) is currently under scrutiny following serious allegations from the Institute of Economic Research and Public Policy (IERPP), a prominent policy think tank. The IERPP claims that GoldBod has removed its crucial quarterly trading reports from its official website, raising significant concerns about transparency within the nation's gold sector. This development places fresh pressure on GoldBod to uphold its public disclosure obligations.

The IERPP formally issued a statement on Monday, August 25, 2026, directly challenging GoldBod's actions. In their communication, the think tank demanded immediate and comprehensive answers from the Board regarding the alleged removal of these vital documents. This incident highlights a potential IERPP GoldBod transparency law breach Ghana, drawing attention to the statutory requirements governing the Board's operations.

At the heart of the IERPP's demand is Section 42 of the Ghana Gold Board Act, 2025 (Act 1140). This specific legislative provision explicitly mandates GoldBod to publish quarterly reports. These reports are designed to provide a comprehensive overview of the Board's activities, ensuring accountability and public access to critical information.

Section 42 of the Ghana Gold Board Act 1140 stipulates that these quarterly reports must detail various aspects of GoldBod's operations. This includes, but is not limited to, its overall operational activities, revenue generation, contracts entered into, expenditure, and crucially, its responsible sourcing practices. The alleged GoldBod quarterly reports removal directly contravenes these clear legal requirements, prompting the IERPP Ghana Gold Board allegations.

The current allegations against GoldBod underscore the broader importance of transparency compliance within the Ghana mining sector. Adherence to statutory reporting requirements, such as those outlined in Act 1140, is fundamental for fostering public trust, attracting responsible investment, and ensuring good governance in a sector vital to the national economy. The IERPP's intervention serves as a reminder that civil society organizations are actively monitoring compliance with these legal frameworks.

This situation could have significant ramifications for how transparency is perceived and enforced across Ghana's natural resource industries. The demand for urgent answers from GoldBod signals a heightened expectation for public bodies to not only generate but also consistently make accessible the information required by law. The outcome of this challenge will likely set a precedent for future Ghana mining sector transparency compliance efforts.

Lawyers and compliance officers advising entities within Ghana's gold sector should immediately review their clients' adherence to Section 42 of the Ghana Gold Board Act, 2025 (Act 1140), particularly regarding the public disclosure of quarterly operational and financial reports. This incident signals heightened scrutiny and potential enforcement actions for non-compliance with statutory transparency mandates.

Source: Original reporting via IERPP statement