GTMS Liberia: Disowns Tenwah Johnson Appointments, Warns Public
Legal News

GTMS Liberia: Disowns Tenwah Johnson Appointments, Warns Public

Liberia·Briefly Analysis⏱️ 4 min read

Summary

  • GTMS Liberia Inc. has rejected the appointments of Presley S. Tenwah and Elvis D. Johnson, stating they were unauthorized.
  • The appointments were allegedly made by Sahr H. W. Ngegba, whom GTMS Liberia denies is a director or authorized officer.
  • GTMS Liberia warns the public against transacting with Tenwah or Johnson, asserting such dealings will not be binding.
  • The company clarified it is separate from GTMS-UK, which is currently undergoing liquidation in the United Kingdom.
  • GTMS Liberia has instructed AFDASA Global's counsel to pursue civil and criminal proceedings against Tenwah and Johnson for false representation and reputational harm.

Corporate Identity Dispute Unfolds at GTMS Liberia

The company has formally instructed the Global Lead Counsel of AFDASA Global to pursue all possible civil and criminal proceedings against Presley S. Tenwah and Elvis D. Johnson.

GTMS Liberia Inc. has publicly disavowed the appointments of two individuals to key management roles, issuing a stern warning to its clientele and business associates regarding any dealings with these individuals on the company's behalf. The firm specifically rejected the purported designations of Presley S. Tenwah as General Manager-Liberia and Elvis D. Johnson as Public Relations Executive and Operations Manager. These appointments, which GTMS Liberia noted with considerable concern, were allegedly orchestrated by Sahr H. W. Ngegba, an individual who, according to the company, has been presenting himself as a director. GTMS Liberia unequivocally denies that Ngegba holds any such directorial position within its corporate structure. The company asserts that Ngegba's name does not appear in its official staff register, corporate records, or list of authorized officers, thereby confirming his lack of legitimate affiliation. Consequently, GTMS Liberia maintains that Ngegba possesses no legitimate authority to make appointments or conduct any business transactions on its behalf, rendering any such actions null and void. This development highlights a significant Liberia corporate representation dispute, raising questions about corporate governance compliance Liberia.

Disputed Authority and International Separation

The company has further distanced itself from any perceived connection to GTMS-UK, clarifying that it operates as a completely separate and distinct entity. GTMS Liberia explicitly stated that it is neither a subsidiary nor a partner of the British organization. This distinction is particularly relevant given that GTMS-UK is currently undergoing liquidation proceedings in the United Kingdom, having been formally wound up. GTMS Liberia alleges that the unauthorized appointments of Presley S. Tenwah and Elvis D. Johnson were deliberately intended to mislead the public and improperly exploit its established corporate name and reputation.

In addition to these claims, GTMS Liberia has also raised allegations concerning administrative and financial irregularities associated with the UK entity, though these specific assertions have not been independently verified by the original reporting source. The firm has strongly advised all customers, business partners, and the general public to refrain from engaging in any transactions with Tenwah or Johnson that purport to represent GTMS Liberia, emphasizing that any such dealings will not be recognized as binding upon the company. This situation underscores the risks associated with GTMS Liberia unauthorized representatives.

Legal Recourse and Unverified Claims

In response to what it describes as false representation and attempts to cause operational disruption and reputational harm, GTMS Liberia has initiated robust legal action. The company has formally instructed the Global Lead Counsel of AFDASA Global to pursue all possible civil and criminal proceedings against Presley S. Tenwah and Elvis D. Johnson. GTMS Liberia accuses these individuals of falsely presenting themselves as legitimate officers, thereby misleading the public and undermining the company's operations.

It is important to note that these accusations against Tenwah, Johnson, and Ngegba remain unadjudicated by any court, and there has been no reported formal response from the accused parties regarding the claims made by GTMS Liberia. Despite this, GTMS Liberia has affirmed its unwavering commitment to protecting its corporate identity, stakeholders, and the public interest. The company declared its intention to "pursue all available legal remedies" to safeguard its name and operations from such unauthorized actions.

Practical Implications

This development serves as a critical warning for legal and compliance professionals to advise clients on enhanced due diligence when engaging with Liberian entities, specifically GTMS Liberia. It underscores the necessity of verifying the authority of all representatives to prevent exposure to unauthorized transactions, potential fraud, and subsequent litigation arising from corporate identity disputes.

Source

Source: Original reporting via New Dawn

Get Deeper AI analysis

How does this affect you?

Get an AI analysis of this article grounded in your jurisdictions, practice areas, and any policy documents you've uploaded to Wansom.

Finish Reading the Full Story and the Expert Analysis.

Get the latest legal & regulatory intelligence in Liberia

Instant access to full analysis, cited statutes & expert commentary
Customize your dashboard to track what matters to your business operations

Already have an account? Log in

Wansom is AI and can make mistakes.