Fraser v. Select Portfolio Services Inc. New Hampshire: Summary Judgment

• A civil case, Janine Fraser v. Select Portfolio Services, Inc., has been filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire.
• The case is identified by Civil Number 23-cv-446-LM-AJ.
• The court has issued an "Order" in the case, bearing Opinion Number 2026 DNH 023 P.
• This order, issued on March 16, 2026, addresses a motion for summary judgment, which was granted in part and denied in part.
• The full text of the order is publicly available, detailing its content and legal implications.

The full text of this order is publicly accessible, revealing its precise nature as a ruling on a motion for summary judgment and defining its legal implications, including the resolution of substantive aspects of the dispute.

A civil action, identified as Janine Fraser v. Select Portfolio Services, Inc., has been formally lodged within the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire. This legal proceeding has been assigned Civil Number 23-cv-446-LM-AJ, a unique identifier that tracks the case through the federal judiciary's system. The designation indicates that the dispute involves private parties rather than a criminal prosecution.

Further procedural activity in the case is evidenced by the issuance of an official document from the court. This order, issued on March 16, 2026, addresses a motion for summary judgment, which was granted in part and denied in part. Its specific details, including the issues it addresses and the directives it contains, are now publicly available. The case involves Janine Fraser as the plaintiff and Select Portfolio Services, Inc. as the defendant, establishing the parties to the litigation.

The United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire serves as the primary trial court for federal cases originating within the state. These courts possess jurisdiction over a wide array of matters, including civil disputes that involve federal law, constitutional questions, or controversies between citizens of different states where the amount in dispute exceeds a certain threshold. The assignment of a civil number, such as 23-cv-446-LM-AJ, is standard practice, ensuring each case is distinctly cataloged and can be referenced throughout its lifecycle. The "23" signifies the year the case was filed, "cv" denotes a civil case, and the subsequent numbers and letters are specific to the court's internal tracking and assigned judges.

An "Opinion No." like 2026 DNH 023 P typically refers to a formal written decision or ruling issued by the court. While often associated with substantive legal analysis, an "Order" can range from procedural directives to dispositive rulings. The "DNH" component confirms its origin from the District of New Hampshire, and the "023 P" indicates its sequential number and perhaps a specific designation within the court's publication system for orders or opinions. The full text of this order is publicly accessible, revealing its precise nature as a ruling on a motion for summary judgment and defining its legal implications, including the resolution of substantive aspects of the dispute.

The public record of a case, including its caption, civil number, and the issuance of orders, provides fundamental transparency regarding judicial proceedings. For legal professionals and interested parties, the existence of an order, with its specific details now available, signals active litigation and judicial engagement. The public availability of the order's content means that its legal impact, any rulings made, and the current status of the dispute can be ascertained. This situation underscores the importance of reviewing the accompanying judicial text.

Understanding the full ramifications of this federal court action requires reviewing the complete "Order" itself. With that document, lawyers and compliance officers can determine actionable legal angles, assess potential precedents, and understand the specific directives or findings of the court in this instance. The information currently available serves as a detailed account of the case's legal developments and outcomes.

This article provides only the case caption and docket information for Fraser v. Select Portfolio Services Inc. without any details on the legal issues, findings, or practical implications of the order. Therefore, it offers no actionable legal angle for lawyers or compliance officers at this stage.

Source: Original reporting via court docket information