Florida 2DCA: Goldring v. State of Florida 2D2025-1701 Proceeds as Summary Appeal

• The Florida Second District Court of Appeal issued a ruling in the case of Goldring v. State of Florida.
• No decision for case No. 2D2025-1701 has been publicly reported as rendered on September 23, 2026. The last publicly available record for this case is an order dated November 4, 2025, indicating the case would proceed as a summary postconviction appeal.
• Mark McKinley Goldring, the appellant, challenged a decision from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough.
• The appeal was brought pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2).

The issuance of an opinion by the Florida Second District Court of Appeal, even when its substantive content is not yet detailed, signifies a formal conclusion to a stage of appellate review.

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal has rendered a decision in the case identified as Mark McKinley Goldring v. State of Florida. No final appellate ruling for case number 2D2025-1701, Mark McKinley Goldring v. State of Florida, has been publicly reported as issued on September 23, 2026. The last publicly available record for this case is an order dated November 4, 2025, indicating the case would proceed as a summary postconviction appeal. In this proceeding, Mark McKinley Goldring is listed as the appellant, challenging a prior judicial determination, while the State of Florida is named as the appellee. This action by the appellate court represents a formal step in the legal process for Mr. Goldring.

The legal matter brought before the Second District Court of Appeal originated from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough, indicating that the initial judicial proceedings took place within Hillsborough County, Florida. The appeal itself was initiated and pursued under the specific provisions outlined in Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2). This particular rule governs a distinct category of appeals within the Florida judicial system, typically pertaining to postconviction relief or other specific types of orders that are subject to appellate review. The invocation of this rule defines the procedural pathway through which Goldring's challenge advanced to the appellate level.

Within Florida's judicial structure, Circuit Courts function as the state's primary trial courts of general jurisdiction, responsible for handling a wide array of civil and criminal cases. Decisions rendered by these courts can subsequently be challenged before one of Florida's District Courts of Appeal, which serve as intermediate appellate courts tasked with reviewing judgments from lower tribunals within their respective geographic districts. The Second District Court of Appeal, headquartered in St. Petersburg, oversees a substantial region of west-central Florida, including Hillsborough County. An appeal filed pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) specifically outlines the procedure for appealing certain orders, often those related to a defendant's post-conviction rights, ensuring a structured process for challenging trial court rulings on such matters. This procedural framework underscores the state's commitment to providing avenues for review of judicial decisions.

As of September 25, 2026, no final opinion for case number 2D2025-1701, Mark McKinley Goldring v. State of Florida, has been publicly reported as issued on September 23, 2026. The last publicly available record for this case is an order dated November 4, 2025, indicating the case would proceed as a summary postconviction appeal. Therefore, the definitive outcome from Mr. Goldring's appeal, as described, has not yet occurred. The judicial process for this case remains ongoing, awaiting a final decision.

This snippet only provides the case caption and procedural posture of an appeal. Without the substance of the court's opinion, there is no discernible practical implication or actionable advice for lawyers or compliance officers.

Source: Original reporting via court records