Elimbi Lobé: Critiques Cabral Libii Vice-Président Cameroun Inconsistency

• On September 20, 2026, Elimbi Lobé criticized Cabral Libii on Info Tv for his perceived political inconsistency regarding Cameroon's vice-presidency.
• Libii, a deputy and PCRN president, had released a video in mid-September 2026 urging President Paul Biya to urgently appoint a vice-president to secure institutions and stabilize state transition.
• Lobé argued Libii lacked credibility, noting he was present and voted for the April 2026 constitutional reform that reintroduced the vice-presidency.
• The constitutional law promulgated on April 14, 2026, states the vice-president assists the president and completes the mandate in case of power vacancy.
• More than five months after the reform, the vice-presidential post remains vacant, fueling political tensions between the opposition and majority over future governance.

Lobé contended that Libii had no legitimate grounds for making such demands or reproaching the head of state.

A significant political debate unfolded in Cameroon on Sunday, September 20, 2026, when Elimbi Lobé publicly criticized Cabral Libii, president of the Parti camerounais pour la réconciliation nationale (PCRN). Appearing on Info Tv's "Libre Expression," Lobé specifically targeted Libii's perceived political inconsistency concerning the recently re-established vice-presidency.

Lobé's remarks came in response to a video released by Libii in mid-September 2026. In this video, Libii, who also serves as a deputy, had directly appealed to President Paul Biya, urging him to promptly appoint a vice-president. Libii argued that such an appointment was crucial for safeguarding state institutions and ensuring a stable transition at the highest levels of government.

However, Elimbi Lobé swiftly dismissed Libii's call, questioning his credibility. Lobé contended that Libii had no legitimate grounds for making such demands or reproaching the head of state. This sharp critique highlights the ongoing tensions and differing interpretations of political roles and responsibilities within Cameroon's evolving constitutional landscape, particularly regarding the `Elimbi Lobé critique Cabral Libii vice-président Cameroun`.

The controversy centers on the `poste vice-président Cameroun`, a position that was formally reintroduced into Cameroon's political structure through a `réforme constitutionnelle Cameroun 2026`. This significant amendment was enshrined in a constitutional law promulgated on April 14, 2026. The new legal framework explicitly defines the vice-president's role as assisting the president and, crucially, completing the presidential mandate in the event of a `vacance pouvoir Cameroun`.

Despite the constitutional mandate and the clear provisions for the role, the vice-presidential post has remained vacant for over five months since the reform's enactment. This prolonged vacancy has become a flashpoint, fueling considerable debate and disagreement between the opposition and the ruling majority regarding the future organization of power, particularly in the context of the post-Biya era.

The absence of an appointed vice-president, more than five months after the `loi constitutionnelle 14 avril 2026` came into effect, underscores a period of institutional uncertainty. This situation directly impacts the mechanisms for presidential succession and raises questions about the stability of governance, making the eventual `Paul Biya nomination vice-président` a critical point of interest for political observers and legal professionals alike.

Elimbi Lobé's primary criticism of Cabral Libii revolved around what he termed a lack of credibility and political `Pcrn Cabral Libii incohérence`. Lobé pointed out that Libii was not only present in the National Assembly during the constitutional reform process but also actively voted in favor of the very changes that reintroduced the vice-presidency. According to Lobé, Libii effectively "helped" President Biya implement this reform, making his subsequent demands for an urgent appointment contradictory.

Lobé argued that if Libii genuinely disagreed with what he perceived as institutional dysfunction or manipulation by the ruling regime, his credible course of action would have been to resign from his position as a deputy. Instead, Lobé asserted, Libii participated in the vote for the new Constitution and then proceeded to offer unsolicited governance advice to the president, undermining his own stance.

Furthermore, Lobé highlighted that Article 12 of the Constitution, which designates the Prime Minister as the head of government responsible for directing its actions, remains unchanged. He suggested that if Libii had concerns about governance, he should have addressed them to the Prime Minister rather than the President, especially given his prior support for the constitutional changes. Lobé concluded that Libii's debate was futile, particularly coming from someone who claimed disagreement but remained in the assembly and received parliamentary indemnity.

The ongoing dispute between Elimbi Lobé and Cabral Libii reflects deeper political anxieties within Cameroon, particularly concerning presidential succession and institutional stability. The continued vacancy of the vice-presidential post, despite its constitutional reintroduction, has become a central point of contention, exacerbating tensions between the opposition and the majority regarding the future political landscape.

Lobé's sharp critique of Libii's perceived `Pcrn Cabral Libii incohérence` underscores a broader concern about political integrity and consistency among leaders. By questioning Libii's motives and past actions, Lobé brings to light the complexities of political maneuvering surrounding critical constitutional reforms and their implementation.

Ultimately, the debate initiated by Lobé serves as a barometer for the political climate in Cameroon, where the re-established vice-presidency remains a symbol of unresolved questions about power transition and institutional robustness. The call for a `Paul Biya nomination vice-président` by some, contrasted with criticisms of those making such calls, illustrates the intricate and often contradictory dynamics at play in the nation's political discourse.

This article underscores the political and constitutional uncertainty surrounding the newly re-established Vice-Presidential post in Cameroon following the April 2026 reform. Legal professionals should closely monitor the eventual appointment or continued vacancy of this position, as it directly impacts presidential succession mechanisms and institutional stability, which can have broader implications for legal and regulatory predictability.

Source: Original reporting via Actu Cameroun