
US District Court Kansas: Durayle Jackson v. Emmit Lockridge Kansas Lawsuit Initiated
Summary
- A new federal civil lawsuit, Durayle Jackson v. Emmit Lockridge, et al., has been filed.
- The case was initiated in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas.
- The assigned case number for this proceeding is 5:25-CV-3013-EFM-JBW.
- Durayle Jackson is identified as the plaintiff, while Emmit Lockridge and additional parties are named as defendants.
Case Commencement in Kansas
The commencement of a civil case in a U.S. District Court signifies that a plaintiff is seeking legal redress or resolution for a dispute under federal law or involving parties from different states.
A new federal civil action has been initiated in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas. This legal proceeding, identified by the case number 5:25-CV-3013-EFM-JBW, lists Durayle Jackson as the plaintiff. The filing marks the formal beginning of a dispute that will unfold within the federal judicial system, bringing the matter before a federal judge in Kansas.
The defendants in this recently filed case include Emmit Lockridge and additional unnamed parties, indicated by the Latin legal phrase "et al." The inclusion of "et al." suggests that while Emmit Lockridge is a named defendant, other individuals or entities may also be involved in the litigation, though their specific identities are not detailed in the initial filing information. This common legal shorthand often points to a broader scope of parties than explicitly listed in the primary caption of Durayle Jackson v. Emmit Lockridge Kansas.
Federal Civil Litigation Overview
The commencement of a civil case in a U.S. District Court signifies that a plaintiff is seeking legal redress or resolution for a dispute under federal law or involving parties from different states. Such filings typically involve a complaint outlining the plaintiff's allegations, the legal basis for the claims, and the requested relief. The specific case number, 5:25-CV-3013-EFM-JBW, provides a unique identifier for this particular lawsuit within the federal court system, ensuring it can be tracked and referenced.
The structure of the case number itself offers insights into the filing. "5" often denotes the specific division within the District of Kansas where the case was filed, while "25" indicates the year of filing, 2025. "CV" confirms it is a civil case, and "3013" is the sequential number assigned to the case within that year and division. The appended "EFM-JBW" typically refers to the initials of the assigned district judge and magistrate judge, respectively, who will oversee the proceedings in this Federal civil case Kansas.
Identifying the Parties and Jurisdiction
The plaintiff, Durayle Jackson, has brought this action against Emmit Lockridge and others. In federal civil litigation, the plaintiff is the party initiating the lawsuit, alleging harm or seeking to enforce a right. The defendant, conversely, is the party against whom the claims are made. The "et al." designation for the defendants means that while Emmit Lockridge is explicitly named, the lawsuit encompasses additional parties whose identities would be revealed in the full complaint document, further detailing the Lockridge Durayle Jackson dispute.
The jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the District of Kansas means that the legal issues presented in this case fall under federal purview, either due to the nature of the claims (e.g., federal statutes, constitutional issues) or the diversity of citizenship between the parties, where the amount in controversy exceeds a statutory threshold. The court's location in Kansas also indicates that the events giving rise to the lawsuit likely occurred within that state, or that at least one of the parties resides there, establishing proper venue for this US District Court Kansas lawsuit.
Why It Matters
While the initial public record of this case, 5:25-CV-3013-EFM-JBW, provides no substantive details regarding the specific allegations or the nature of the dispute, its filing is a significant procedural event. It signals the formal activation of the federal judicial machinery to resolve a conflict involving Durayle Jackson and Emmit Lockridge, along with other unnamed defendants. For legal professionals and interested parties, the mere existence of such a filing indicates that a new legal challenge has begun in the District of Kansas.
The absence of further information in this initial report underscores that the case is in its nascent stages. Subsequent filings, such as the complaint itself, motions, and court orders, will eventually shed light on the specific claims, defenses, and the trajectory of the litigation. Until then, the record simply confirms the commencement of a federal civil case in Kansas, involving the identified parties, Durayle Jackson and Emmit Lockridge, et al.
Practical Implications
This article merely identifies the existence of a new federal civil case filing in the District of Kansas by its caption and case number. It contains no substantive information, ruling, or development that would have a practical implication for a lawyer or compliance officer beyond noting the case's commencement.
Source
How does this affect you?
Get an AI analysis of this article grounded in your jurisdictions, practice areas, and any policy documents you've uploaded to Wansom.
Finish Reading the Full Story and the Expert Analysis.
Get the latest legal & regulatory intelligence in United States
Wansom is AI and can make mistakes.
