Pikine-Guédiawaye: Diodio Glow Skin Rox Instruction Judiciaire Possible

• Diodio Glow Skin and Rox are in custody at the Special Cybercrime Division, awaiting appearance before the Pikine-Guédiawaye prosecutor on October 26, 2026.
• The investigation centers on alleged money transfers, which the women claim were donations for social causes, denying links to cyber-harassment.
• Voice recordings, including one discussing 7 million FCFA received from Diodio Glow Skin, are key evidence in the inquiry.
• The prosecutor may initiate a judicial investigation following their appearance, potentially leading to a formal Diodio Glow Skin Rox instruction judiciaire.
• Rox's lawyer, Me Taha Cissé, plans to argue the 'non bis in idem' principle, asserting his client cannot be tried twice for the same facts.

The application of the non bis in idem principle in this high-profile cyber-harassment case could establish significant precedents for future digital crime prosecutions and defense approaches within Senegal's legal system.

Mame Diarra Thiam, widely recognized as Diodio Glow Skin, and the influencer Rokhaya Fall, known as Rox, remain in police custody at the Division spéciale de la cybersécurité (DSC). Diodio Glow Skin's detention has been extended, meaning she will spend the weekend at the police facility. Both individuals are expected to be presented before the Parquet de Pikine-Guédiawaye on Monday, October 26, 2026, for their formal appearance.

The core of the current investigation revolves around various money transfers. While the two women assert these funds were charitable donations intended for social initiatives, including efforts to combat cancer, authorities are scrutinizing their claims. They vehemently deny any connection between these financial transactions and an alleged cyber-harcèlement Sénégal campaign, which forms a significant part of the ongoing inquiry.

Central to the confrontation between Diodio Glow Skin and Rox are several voice recordings, as reported by Libération. These audio snippets reportedly contain discussions about financial exchanges, with one notable excerpt quoted as: "Na Diodio deff béné 500 ma taaleu live…" This suggests a direct link between the individuals and specific monetary sums.

Further evidence uncovered by investigators includes a private audio file found in the cloud, featuring Rox and an individual named Adamo. Sources cited by L'Observateur indicate that this particular recording discusses the distribution of 7 million FCFA, which was allegedly received from Diodio Glow Skin. The Division spéciale cybersécurité enquête is also extending its reach, with pressafrik reporting that investigations are underway into foreign bank accounts and that additional individuals are slated for questioning as the probe continues.

Following their défèrement before the Pikine-Guédiawaye prosecutor, the possibility of a full Diodio Glow Skin Rox instruction judiciaire is being considered by the prosecutor. This judicial investigation would delve deeper into the allegations, potentially leading to formal charges. However, Me Taha Cissé, who represents Rox, has already signaled a key defense strategy, invoking the principle of non bis in idem.

Me Cissé contends that his client cannot be subjected to a second trial for the same set of facts, suggesting that previous legal proceedings might preclude new charges related to the current allegations. The application of the non bis in idem principle in this high-profile cyber-harassment case could establish significant precedents for future digital crime prosecutions and defense approaches within Senegal's legal system.

Lawyers and compliance officers should closely follow the judicial investigation into Diodio Glow Skin and Rox, particularly how the 'non bis in idem' principle is applied in this cyber-harassment and alleged illicit money transfer case. The outcome could set precedents for digital crime prosecutions and defense strategies in Senegal.

Source: Original reporting via local media outlets