Calcutta High Court Pulls Up Lawyer Firdous Samim for Using Slang Against Judge

• The Calcutta High Court has pulled up advocate Firdous Samim for using slang against a judge during a hearing.
• Samim allegedly used unparliamentary language in court on July 23, which was streamed live online.
• The High Court took suo motu cognisance of the incident and directed Samim to apologize and provide an undertaking, stating it would consider formal contempt proceedings thereafter.
• The Court expressed strong displeasure over the incident and observed that such conduct by a member of the Bar could not be treated lightly.

The language used by the said advocate during Court hearing which was being streamed live is an act of misdemeanour and reflects an audacious and contemptuous attitude of the said advocate towards this Hon'ble High Court as well as the Hon'ble Judge presiding over the Bench, in flagrant violation of the Hon'ble Court's decorum and discipline.

The Calcutta High Court's recent action against an advocate for using unparliamentary language in court has significant implications for the legal profession. The incident highlights the importance of maintaining decorum and discipline within the courtroom, not just for the sake of the institution but also to uphold the dignity of the law. The consequences of such behavior can be severe, including criminal contempt proceedings that can damage a lawyer's reputation and career. This case serves as a reminder to lawyers of the need to conduct themselves with professionalism and respect in court, even in the face of adversity or rejection of their pleas. The Calcutta High Court's action is also a testament to its commitment to upholding the rule of law and maintaining the integrity of the judicial process.

The incident involving advocate Firdous Samim occurred on July 23, during a hearing before a single judge. The matter was tied to a plea in which Samim appeared, and his use of unparliamentary language was reportedly streamed live online. In response, the High Court took suo motu cognisance of the incident and directed Samim to apologize before the concerned judge during live proceedings and submit an undertaking that such conduct would not be repeated, stating that it would consider whether to issue a formal rule of contempt thereafter. The Court's action was based on its observation that Samim's behavior reflected an audacious and contemptuous attitude towards the Hon'ble High Court as well as the Hon'ble Judge presiding over the Bench. The language used by Samim was deemed to be in flagrant violation of the Hon'ble Court's decorum and discipline.

The Calcutta High Court has pulled up advocate Firdous Samim for using slang against a judge during a hearing. The incident occurred on July 23, when Samim allegedly used unparliamentary language in court. The matter was tied to a plea in which he appeared, and his behavior was reportedly streamed live online. The High Court took suo motu cognisance of the incident and directed Samim to apologize before the concerned judge during live proceedings and submit an undertaking that such conduct would not be repeated, stating that it would consider whether to issue a formal rule of contempt thereafter. The Court expressed strong displeasure over the incident and observed that such conduct by a member of the Bar could not be treated lightly.

Lawyers should be aware that using unparliamentary language in court can lead to criminal contempt proceedings, which can have serious consequences for their reputation and career.

Source: Original reporting via Calcutta HC