Oregon Court of Appeals: Issues Decision in Baker v. Pedro Oregon 2026

• The Oregon Court of Appeals issued a decision in *Ernest Harold Baker III v. David Pedro* on November 4, 2026.
• Ernest Harold Baker, III, is the Petitioner-Appellant, while David Pedro, Superintendent of Eastern Oregon Correctional Institution, is the Defendant-Respondent.
• The case is identified as Oregon Court of Appeals No. 1060.
• The appellate case originated from the Umatilla County Circuit Court, where it was numbered 23CV17033.

The ruling in *Baker v. Pedro Oregon 2026* from the Oregon Court of Appeals contributes to the evolving body of legal precedent within the state.

The Oregon Court of Appeals issued a decision on November 4, 2026, in the case identified as No. 1060, titled *Ernest Harold Baker III v. David Pedro*. This appellate proceeding involves Ernest Harold Baker, III, who is designated as the Petitioner-Appellant, challenging a prior ruling.

The respondent in this matter is David Pedro, who holds the position of Superintendent at the Eastern Oregon Correctional Institution. The case, commonly referred to as *Baker v. Pedro*, originated in the Umatilla County Circuit Court, where it was assigned the case number 23CV17033. This appellate review signifies a formal challenge to the lower court's findings or procedures, bringing the dispute before a higher judicial authority in Oregon.

In the context of the Oregon legal system, an individual or entity designated as a Petitioner-Appellant, such as Ernest Harold Baker, III, initiates an appeal to contest a judgment or order issued by a lower court. This party seeks to have the appellate court review and potentially reverse or modify the previous decision. The Defendant-Respondent, in this instance David Pedro, Superintendent, Eastern Oregon Correctional Institution, is the party against whom the appeal is brought, defending the outcome of the initial proceedings.

The progression of this matter from the Umatilla County Circuit Court, under case number 23CV17033, to the Oregon Court of Appeals as No. 1060, underscores the structured process for legal redress within the state. The appellate court's role is to scrutinize the legal arguments and record from the trial court, ensuring that legal principles were correctly applied and that due process was observed. The November 4, 2026, decision marks a significant step in this specific legal journey.

The ruling in *Baker v. Pedro Oregon 2026* from the Oregon Court of Appeals contributes to the evolving body of legal precedent within the state. Decisions from this court provide crucial guidance for future cases, particularly those that may involve correctional institutions or administrative actions taken by their superintendents. Legal professionals in Oregon will undoubtedly examine this new appellate case for its implications.

Monitoring developments such as the *Ernest Harold Baker III v. David Pedro* decision, particularly one originating from the Umatilla County Circuit Court 23CV17033 and now bearing the Oregon Court of Appeals No. 1060, is essential for practitioners. This ruling, issued on November 4, 2026, will help shape the interpretation and application of law in relevant areas, offering clarity or new considerations for similar disputes moving forward.

This is a new appellate case in Oregon. Lawyers practicing in Oregon should be aware of this new precedent for potential citation or to monitor its development if it pertains to their practice area, particularly if it involves correctional institutions.

Source: Original reporting via Oregon Court of Appeals document