Mississippi Court of Appeals: Anthony Pittman v State Appeal Docketed

• The Mississippi Court of Appeals has docketed case NO. 2024-KA-00983-COA.
• Anthony Dewayne Pittman, also known by several aliases, is the appellant in this case.
• The State of Mississippi is listed as the appellee, defending a prior judgment.
• The appeal challenges a judgment issued on May 23, 2024, from a trial presided over by Judge Michael M. Taylor.
• This initial filing confirms the procedural start of an appellate review without detailing specific legal arguments.

However, it is important to note that this initial docket entry provides no insight into the substantive legal arguments or the specific issues that Mr. Pittman intends to raise before the Mississippi Court of Appeals.

The Mississippi Court of Appeals has formally docketed a new case, identified as NO. 2024-KA-00983-COA, involving Anthony Dewayne Pittman. This filing marks the beginning of an appellate review process where Mr. Pittman, also known by the aliases Anthony D. Pittman, Anthony Pittman, and "Tiger," is listed as the appellant. He is challenging a prior judicial decision.

The State of Mississippi is designated as the appellee in this proceeding, indicating its role in defending the judgment rendered by a lower court. This appellate action follows a judgment issued on May 23, 2024. The original judicial determination that Mr. Pittman is now appealing was overseen by the Honorable Michael M. Taylor, who served as the trial judge in the preceding court.

This initial court document serves primarily to establish the parties and the procedural posture of the case. It confirms that a formal challenge to a previous ruling has been lodged within the state's appellate system. The case number provides a unique identifier for tracking its progress through the Court of Appeals.

The Mississippi Court of Appeals functions as an intermediate appellate court within the state's judicial structure. Its primary role is to review decisions made by lower trial courts, ensuring that legal procedures were followed correctly and that the law was applied appropriately. When a party, such as Anthony Dewayne Pittman, brings a case before this court, they are seeking a re-examination of specific aspects of their original trial or hearing.

In this context, the appellant, Anthony Dewayne Pittman, is the party who has initiated the appeal, expressing dissatisfaction with the outcome or conduct of the previous legal proceeding. The appellee, the State of Mississippi, is the party against whom the appeal is brought, and it will typically argue for the affirmation of the lower court's judgment. This adversarial structure is fundamental to the appellate review system, allowing for a thorough re-evaluation of contested legal points.

The "Date of Judgment" specified as May 23, 2024, refers to the date the final decision was rendered in the trial court from which this appeal originates. This date is crucial as it typically sets the timeline for filing an appeal. The involvement of the Honorable Michael M. Taylor as the trial judge further clarifies that this appellate case stems from a specific judicial action in a lower court, now subject to scrutiny by a higher judicial body.

The mere filing of an appeal, as seen in the case of Anthony Pittman v. State Mississippi, represents a critical procedural step in the pursuit of justice within the legal system. It signifies that at least one party believes an error occurred in the initial trial court proceedings, or that the law was misapplied, warranting a review by a higher judicial authority. While this initial document does not detail the specific grounds for Mr. Pittman's appeal, its existence confirms his exercise of the right to challenge a prior ruling.

Such filings are essential for maintaining checks and balances within the judiciary, providing an avenue for correcting potential errors and ensuring consistency in legal interpretations. The appellate court will not conduct a new trial but will instead review the record of the lower court proceedings, including transcripts and submitted legal arguments, to determine if any reversible errors were made. This process is distinct from a retrial, focusing strictly on legal and procedural adherence.

For legal practitioners and the public, this document serves as an official notification that the case of Anthony Dewayne Pittman is now active within the appellate system. It confirms the parties involved, the originating court's judge, and the date of the judgment under review. However, it is important to note that this initial docket entry provides no insight into the substantive legal arguments or the specific issues that Mr. Pittman intends to raise before the Mississippi Court of Appeals.

This document is merely the header for a Court of Appeals case in Mississippi, indicating its existence and basic parties. It provides no actionable legal reasoning, precedent, or specific facts for a lawyer or compliance officer to act upon beyond noting the case's filing.

Source: Original reporting via Mississippi Court of Appeals filing.