US District Court: Anthony Lopez Sues Corrections Officer Reyas in New York

• Anthony Lopez has initiated a lawsuit in federal court.
• The case names Corrections Officer Reyas and other unnamed parties as defendants.
• The legal action is filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York.
• The assigned case number for this proceeding is 9:26-CV-0302 (ECC/ML).
• This document is solely a case caption and provides no substantive legal details or rulings.

This document, being solely a case caption, contains no substantive legal rulings, factual details, or developments that would offer actionable legal implications for a lawyer or compliance officer.

The United States District Court for the Northern District of New York has recorded the initiation of a new civil action, identified by the case number 9:26-CV-0302 (ECC/ML). This federal court filing lists Anthony Lopez as the plaintiff, the party bringing the legal claim. The action is directed against Corrections Officer Reyas, who is named as a defendant, along with other unnamed parties indicated by the Latin legal phrase "et al."

This initial document serves as the formal record of the lawsuit's commencement within the federal judiciary system. It establishes the foundational details necessary for tracking the proceeding, including the specific court where the matter will be heard and the primary individuals or entities involved. The designation "Original document" further clarifies its status as a primary record in the case file.

The United States District Court for the Northern District of New York operates as a federal trial court, handling a range of civil and criminal cases that fall under federal jurisdiction. The case number, 9:26-CV-0302 (ECC/ML), provides a structured identifier for this specific litigation. The initial '9' typically denotes the district, '26' indicates the year of filing (2026, assuming a standard convention where '26' refers to the last two digits of the year), 'CV' signifies a civil case, and '0302' is a sequential number assigned to the filing within that year. The parenthetical (ECC/ML) usually refers to the initials of the presiding judge and magistrate judge assigned to the case, respectively.

The inclusion of "et al." after "Corrections Officer Reyas" in the defendant's designation is a common legal abbreviation for "et alii," meaning "and others." This signifies that while Corrections Officer Reyas is specifically named, there are additional defendants involved in the lawsuit whose names are not explicitly detailed in this particular caption. This practice is standard when multiple parties are sued, and the full list of defendants may be extensive or will be elaborated upon in subsequent pleadings.

While the filing of Anthony Lopez v. Corrections Officer Reyas, et al. marks the formal commencement of a legal dispute in the federal system, it is crucial to understand the limited nature of the information provided by this specific document. As a mere case caption, it functions primarily as an administrative identifier, outlining the parties, the court, and the unique docket number assigned to the proceeding. It does not, however, contain any substantive legal rulings, factual allegations, or developments regarding the merits of the case.

For legal professionals, compliance officers, or anyone seeking to understand the actual claims, defenses, or judicial decisions related to this matter, this caption offers no actionable legal implications. This document, being solely a case caption, contains no substantive legal rulings, factual details, or developments that would offer actionable legal implications for a lawyer or compliance officer. The document's purpose is to establish the existence of the case and its basic parameters, serving as a placeholder for the more detailed pleadings, motions, and orders that will follow as the litigation progresses. Therefore, while it confirms a lawsuit has been initiated, it reveals nothing about its substance or potential outcome.

This document is merely a case caption and does not contain any substantive legal rulings, facts, or developments that would provide an actionable legal implication for a lawyer or compliance officer.

Source: Information derived from a federal court filing