
State Supreme Court: 135 Kaka LLC v. Wu Case Filed
Summary
- A case titled `135 Kaka LLC v. Wu` was electronically filed in a state's Supreme Court.
- The filing occurred on September 9, 2026, at 8:46 AM, and is identified by docket number `SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX`.
- This specific submission is recorded as document number 18 and originated from ODAC.
- The provided information details only the procedural filing, without revealing the substantive issues of the case.
The Supreme Court Filing
While the specific legal issues or the substantive content of the `original document` in `135 Kaka LLC v. Wu` are not disclosed by the provided information, the mere fact of a `case law filing` reaching a state's Supreme Court carries inherent significance.
A legal action identified as `135 Kaka LLC v. Wu` has been formally recorded within a state's highest judicial body. This `state supreme court case` saw an `original document` electronically submitted on September 9, 2026, precisely at 8:46 AM. The filing is associated with the `SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX docket` number, which serves as its unique identifier within the court's system. This procedural step marks a significant moment in the litigation, indicating that a matter involving `135 Kaka LLC` and `Wu` has reached the apex court of the state.
The electronic submission process ensures a precise timestamp and immediate integration into the court's digital records. This particular `case law filing` is designated as document number 18 on the docket, further specifying its position in the sequence of filings for this particular case. The record also notes its origin from "ODAC," which typically refers to a specific office or department within the court system responsible for handling or processing such submissions, though its exact function in this context is not detailed in the available information.
Procedural Context
The `SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX docket` number is a critical component of the court's administrative system, providing a unique reference for `135 Kaka LLC v. Wu` throughout its journey in the Supreme Court. Such docket numbers are essential for tracking cases, organizing filings, and ensuring that all related documents are correctly associated with the appropriate legal dispute. The repeated appearance of this docket number in the filing details underscores its importance as the primary identifier for this `state supreme court case`.
The designation "Electronically Filed" highlights the modern approach to court administration, where digital submissions have largely replaced traditional paper filings. This method offers efficiency, accuracy in timestamping, and accessibility for court staff and, eventually, the public. The exact time of 08:46 AM on September 9, 2026, is meticulously recorded, reflecting the stringent requirements for precision in legal documentation, where even minutes can be significant in procedural timelines. The reference to "Dkt. 18" indicates that this specific submission is the eighteenth document filed in this particular case, providing a chronological marker within the `SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX` record.
Why This Filing Matters
While the specific legal issues or the substantive content of the `original document` in `135 Kaka LLC v. Wu` are not disclosed by the provided information, the mere fact of a `case law filing` reaching a state's Supreme Court carries inherent significance. It indicates that the legal dispute is of sufficient complexity, importance, or has raised questions of law that warrant review by the highest judicial authority in the jurisdiction. Such cases often involve significant legal precedents, constitutional questions, or matters of broad public interest.
The existence of this `state supreme court case`, identifiable by its `SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX docket` number, means it is now part of the public record, accessible through various legal research platforms. For instance, a search for `CourtListener 135 Kaka LLC` would likely yield information about this procedural event once it is fully processed and indexed. Although the details of the dispute remain private based on the available data, the formal recording of this `original document` at the Supreme Court level signifies a critical procedural milestone in the litigation between `135 Kaka LLC` and `Wu`. This procedural fact alone confirms the progression of a legal matter to the highest appellate tier.
Practical Implications
This article provides only a case name and filing details, offering no substantive information from which to derive a practical legal implication for lawyers or compliance officers.
Source
Source: Based on public court filings.
How does this affect you?
Get an AI analysis of this article grounded in your jurisdictions, practice areas, and any policy documents you've uploaded to Wansom.
Finish Reading the Full Story and the Expert Analysis.
Wansom is AI and can make mistakes.
