11th Circuit Issues Non-Precedential Ruling in Greenidge v. Florida Revenue

The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit filed a document in the case of *Tony Greenidge v. Florida Department of Revenue* on September 11, 2026, indicating an ongoing appellate proceeding designated as "NOT FOR PUBLICATION" and placed on the "Non-Argument Calendar."

This excerpt confirms the filing of Document 9-1, a two-page document, in appellate case number 26-12477. The specific nature of the document or the outcome of the appeal is not detailed. The case involves Tony Greenidge and the Florida Department of Revenue. The designations "NOT FOR PUBLICATION" and "Non-Argument Calendar" are key procedural indicators, signifying that any decision rendered will not establish binding precedent and that the court deemed oral arguments unnecessary for its resolution.

For practitioners, especially those dealing with federal appeals involving state agencies, the "NOT FOR PUBLICATION" designation is a critical point. It means that while the court's decision will be final for Tony Greenidge and the Florida Department of Revenue, it will not create citable precedent that can be used to influence future cases within the Eleventh Circuit. This federal appellate court has jurisdiction over cases originating in Alabama, Florida, and Georgia. The involvement of the Florida Department of Revenue suggests the case may pertain to administrative law, tax disputes, or civil rights claims against a state entity, potentially raising federal questions or diversity jurisdiction issues.

Attorneys should understand that opinions designated as "NOT FOR PUBLICATION" are primarily for the benefit of the parties involved and do not contribute to the body of binding case law. When researching or preparing arguments, practitioners should prioritize published opinions that carry precedential weight. The "Non-Argument Calendar" status further suggests that the court views the legal issues as relatively straightforward or well-settled. The outcome of this specific matter is not reported in the excerpt, but its non-precedential nature means its broader legal impact will be limited.