Eleventh Circuit: United States v. Taris Devoe Hollomon Filed, Not For Publication

• The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit issued a 14-page document on September 1, 2026, in the case of *United States v. Taris Devoe Hollomon*, case number 25-11829.
• This filing is explicitly marked "NOT FOR PUBLICATION," meaning it does not establish binding legal precedent and cannot be cited by attorneys in other cases.
• The appeal was processed on the court's "Non-Argument Calendar," indicating it was resolved without oral argument.
• The decision serves as a procedural update for the parties involved but carries no broader legal implications for general practice.
• The document is identified as Document 31-1 for USCA11 Case 25-11829.

This designation means the decision lacks precedential value and cannot be cited by attorneys in other cases, serving primarily as a procedural update for the parties involved.

The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit has issued a procedural document in the case of *United States v. Taris Devoe Hollomon*. This filing, identified as Document 31-1, was officially recorded on September 1, 2026, and pertains to appellate case number 25-11829. The document itself spans 14 pages and represents a significant procedural step for the parties involved in this federal criminal appeal.

Crucially, the filing is explicitly marked as "NOT FOR PUBLICATION," indicating its limited scope and impact within the broader legal landscape. Furthermore, the case was processed on the court's "Non-Argument Calendar," a procedural designation that signals how the court chose to resolve the appeal. These designations carry specific implications for the precedential value and public accessibility of the court's decision in the *Taris Devoe Hollomon* matter.

The "NOT FOR PUBLICATION" designation applied to the Eleventh Circuit's document in *United States v. Taris Devoe Hollomon* signifies that this particular ruling does not establish binding legal precedent. Unlike published opinions, which serve as authoritative guidance for future cases, unpublished decisions are generally not citable by attorneys in other legal proceedings before the court. This practice is common across federal appellate courts, including the Eleventh Circuit, and is governed by specific court rules.

The primary purpose of an unpublished opinion is to inform the parties directly involved in the appeal of the court's decision and its reasoning, without adding to the body of precedential case law. While the outcome is binding on Taris Devoe Hollomon and the government, it does not carry broader legal implications for general practice. This approach allows the court to efficiently manage its substantial caseload by reserving published opinions for cases that introduce novel legal questions, resolve conflicts in existing law, or involve issues of significant public interest.

The fact that the *Taris Devoe Hollomon* appeal was placed on the Eleventh Circuit's "Non-Argument Calendar" provides further insight into its procedural handling. This calendar is utilized for cases where the appellate panel determines that oral argument would not significantly aid in the decision-making process. Such cases typically involve straightforward legal issues, well-established precedents, or situations where the facts are not in dispute and the written briefs adequately present all necessary arguments.

For a federal criminal appeal like Hollomon's, its placement on the Non-Argument Calendar 11th Circuit indicates that a panel of judges reviewed the submitted briefs and the record and concluded that the issues could be resolved without the need for a formal oral presentation. This procedural mechanism is a key tool for judicial efficiency, allowing the court to process a high volume of appeals while still ensuring thorough review. It underscores that the disposition in USCA11 Case 25-11829 is a procedural resolution tailored to the specific parties, rather than a matter requiring public debate or extensive judicial deliberation in open court.

While the Eleventh Circuit's filing represents a definitive step in the appeal of Taris Devoe Hollomon, its procedural designations mean its impact is largely confined to the immediate parties. The "NOT FOR PUBLICATION" status ensures that this decision will not contribute to the development of legal precedent, meaning it cannot be cited by attorneys seeking to influence outcomes in unrelated cases. This distinction is critical for understanding the hierarchical nature of legal authority in the federal court system.

Consequently, this particular ruling serves as a final procedural update for Taris Devoe Hollomon and the United States, concluding a phase of their legal proceedings. For the broader legal community, the document primarily confirms a procedural disposition within the Eleventh Circuit rather than offering new interpretations of law or setting a precedent that would influence future federal criminal appeals. The outcome, while important to the appellant, does not alter or establish legal principles for general application.

This 'not for publication' decision from the Eleventh Circuit lacks precedential value and cannot be cited by attorneys in other cases. It primarily serves as a procedural update for the parties involved, indicating a non-argument calendar disposition without broader legal implications for general practice.

Source: Reporting based on an Eleventh Circuit court filing.