New York Appellate Division: Sharpe v Peterson 2026 NY Slip Op 06642 Published

• The New York Appellate Division, Fourth Department, has published a new decision in the case of Sharpe v Peterson.
• The ruling, identified as 2026 NY Slip Op 06642, was issued on November 13, 2026.
• Mischelle Sharpe is the plaintiff-respondent, while Ronald K. Peterson, III and Hurtubise Tire, Inc. are the defendants-appellants.
• This decision is currently an uncorrected slip opinion and is subject to revision before its final publication.
• The New York State Law Reporting Bureau published the decision under Judiciary Law § 431.

The release of any new appellate decision, including Sharpe v Peterson, holds importance for legal practitioners across New York State, particularly those operating within the Fourth Department's purview.

The New York legal community has recently seen the publication of a new decision from the Appellate Division, Fourth Department. This ruling, identified as Sharpe v Peterson 2026 NY Slip Op 06642, was officially released on November 13, 2026. The case involves Mischelle Sharpe, who is listed as the plaintiff-respondent, against defendants-appellants Ronald K. Peterson, III and Hurtubise Tire, Inc.

This decision originates from the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department. As is standard practice for newly issued rulings, this particular document is currently an uncorrected slip opinion. This means it remains subject to potential revisions before its final publication in the Official Reports, a crucial step in the formal reporting process for New York State legal opinions.

The New York Appellate Division, Fourth Department, serves as an intermediate appellate court within the state's judicial system, reviewing decisions made by lower trial courts. Its rulings are significant as they establish binding precedent for courts within its geographical jurisdiction, influencing how similar legal questions are decided in the future. The publication of decisions like Sharpe v Peterson is a critical function of the state's legal infrastructure, ensuring transparency and accessibility of judicial pronouncements.

The New York State Law Reporting Bureau is the entity responsible for publishing these judicial decisions, operating under the authority granted by Judiciary Law § 431. This statute mandates the systematic collection and dissemination of court opinions, making them available to legal professionals and the public. The initial release of a decision as a "slip opinion," such as the one in Sharpe v Peterson 2026 NY Slip Op 06642, signifies its immediate availability, though with the caveat that it has not yet undergone the final editorial review process.

The designation that a decision is "uncorrected and subject to revision" is a standard disclaimer for slip opinions. This period allows for the correction of typographical errors, minor factual inaccuracies, or other non-substantive changes that do not alter the legal outcome or reasoning. Once these revisions are complete, the decision is then prepared for its definitive inclusion in the Official Reports, where it becomes part of the permanent, authoritative record of New York case law.

The release of any new appellate decision, including Sharpe v Peterson, holds importance for legal practitioners across New York State, particularly those operating within the Fourth Department's purview. While the specific details of the holding in this instance are not provided in the initial announcement, the mere publication signals the creation of new legal authority. Attorneys routinely monitor these releases to stay abreast of evolving case law and understand how courts are interpreting statutes and applying existing precedents.

For lawyers representing clients in similar matters to those involving Mischelle Sharpe, Ronald K. Peterson, III, and Hurtubise Tire, Inc., this new ruling will eventually become a reference point. Even without knowing the precise issues addressed, the fact that the New York Appellate Division Fourth Department has issued a decision means it contributes to the body of law that guides future litigation and legal advice. Its eventual inclusion in the Official Reports will solidify its status as a formal component of New York's legal landscape.

This article announces the publication of a new decision from the New York Appellate Division, Fourth Department. Lawyers should be aware of this new precedent if it falls within their practice area, but the article provides no details on the holding or practical implications of the case itself.

Source: Original reporting via New York State Law Reporting Bureau.