NALSAR 2026 Batch Students: BCI Threatens to Halt Enrolment Over CJI Surya Kant Campaign

• The Bar Council of India (BCI) has warned NALSAR students against participating in campaigns opposing judicial figures.
• Students involved in the campaign against CJI Surya Kant's participation may face consequences, including deferred enrolment applications.
• The BCI is taking steps to address groupism and dirty politics among some NALSAR students.

If the enrolment application is already pending, the final decision thereon shall remain deferred during the period of inquiry

The Bar Council of India (BCI) has issued a stern warning to students of the 2026 batch at NALSAR, Hyderabad. The BCI is cracking down on any involvement in campaigns opposing judicial figures, specifically targeting those who participated in an organized campaign against Chief Justice of India Surya Kant's participation in the institution's convocation.

The BCI has directed NALSAR Vice-Chancellor Prof Srikrishna Deva Rao and all state bar councils to submit a report on the individuals responsible for initiating, organizing, or mobilizing this campaign. Upon receipt of this report, the BCI will separately inform state bar councils about those whose individual roles warrant further scrutiny.

The BCI's warning is a response to reports of an organized campaign against CJI Surya Kant's participation in the convocation. According to reliable sources, groupism and dirty politics have been prevalent among some students at NALSAR, which has led to this controversy.

The BCI has taken note of these developments and is now taking steps to address the issue. This move highlights the importance of maintaining a professional and respectful environment in institutions of higher learning, particularly those related to law.

If students from the 2026 batch at NALSAR are found to be involved in this campaign, they may face consequences. The BCI has stated that it will communicate the names of such individuals to state bar councils, which will then defer their enrolment applications pending further inquiry.

This development serves as a reminder to lawyers and compliance officers about the importance of maintaining professional boundaries and avoiding involvement in campaigns that may be perceived as opposing judicial figures. This is crucial for future enrolment with state bar councils.

Lawyers and compliance officers should be aware that any involvement in campaigns opposing judicial figures may impact their future enrolment with state bar councils, requiring them to advise clients accordingly.

Source: Original reporting via [Source Name]