Melissa Malone v. Ronald Malone, Jr. 5D2025-0653: Florida Fifth DCA Appeal

• Melissa Lynn Malone has filed an appeal against Ronald Louis Malone, Jr. in Florida.
• The case, identified as 5D2025-0653, is before the Fifth District Court of Appeal.
• The appeal originates from a decision made in the Circuit Court for Marion County by Judge Jennifer Lester Bass.
• The lower court case number associated with this appeal is 2020-DR-003447.
• The current public record provides only identifying information, not the substantive details or outcome of the appeal.

This initial filing provides only the foundational details necessary to identify the parties and the judicial bodies involved, without revealing the underlying legal arguments or the specific outcome being challenged.

An appellate proceeding, identified as Melissa Lynn Malone v. Ronald Louis Malone, Jr. 5D2025-0653, has been formally initiated within the State of Florida's judicial system. This case is currently under review by the Fifth District Court of Appeal Florida, indicating a challenge to a prior judicial determination. The appellant in this matter is Melissa Lynn Malone, who is seeking a review of a lower court's decision, while Ronald Louis Malone, Jr. is listed as the appellee, the party against whom the appeal has been filed.

This particular Florida appellate case 5D2025-0653 carries a lower tribunal case number of 2020-DR-003447, which provides a direct reference to the original proceedings that led to this appeal. The existence of these distinct case numbers underscores the procedural progression from an initial court action to a higher court's examination. The filing marks a significant step in the legal process for both parties involved, signaling a formal request for judicial scrutiny at the appellate level.

The appeal in Melissa Lynn Malone v. Ronald Louis Malone, Jr. originates from the Circuit Court for Marion County, where the initial legal dispute was heard and decided. This detail establishes the geographical and jurisdictional context of the original judgment that is now being contested. The judicial officer presiding over the initial proceedings in Marion County was Judge Jennifer Lester Bass, whose decision is the subject of the current appellate review.

Attorneys associated with the case at the time of the appellate filing were also noted. Christopher R. Bruce was listed, alongside an entry for Ashley Original document. These individuals represent the legal counsel involved in presenting the arguments and navigating the procedural aspects of the appeal before the Fifth District Court of Appeal Florida.

The filing of a case such as Melissa Lynn Malone v. Ronald Louis Malone, Jr. 5D2025-0653 signifies the commencement of a formal review process where a higher court examines the record of a lower court's decision for potential errors. At this stage, the publicly available information primarily consists of identifying details, including the parties involved, the specific courts, and the relevant case numbers. This initial filing provides only the foundational details necessary to identify the parties and the judicial bodies involved, without revealing the underlying legal arguments or the specific outcome being challenged.

An appeal to the Fifth District Court of Appeal Florida means that the appellant believes a legal error occurred in the Marion County Circuit Court. However, the current documentation does not elaborate on the specific grounds for the appeal, the nature of the original dispute, or the legal questions presented for review. The focus at this point remains on the formal identification of the appellate action rather than the substantive legal content.

The formal initiation of the Melissa Lynn Malone v. Ronald Louis Malone, Jr. appeal, designated as Florida appellate case 5D2025-0653, is a critical procedural event. It confirms that a party is exercising their right to challenge a prior judicial ruling, setting in motion the mechanisms of the state's appellate system. While the specific details of the dispute and the legal arguments are not disclosed in this initial public record, the filing itself represents a significant development for the litigants.

Without the court's substantive decision, the specific legal issues or broader implications of this appeal remain undisclosed to the public. The information currently available serves to track the case through the judicial system and acknowledge its existence as a pending matter before the Fifth District Court of Appeal. Further details regarding the court's eventual ruling will be necessary to understand the full impact and legal precedent, if any, that this case may establish.

This article provides only the case caption and basic identifying information for an appeal in Florida. Without the substance of the court's decision, there is no actionable legal implication for a lawyer or compliance officer.

Source: Case details from court records.