New York Appellate Division: Issues Marcano v. Suazo 2026 NY Slip Op 05536 Decision

• The New York Appellate Division, Second Department, issued a decision in Marcano v. Suazo on September 30, 2026.
• The case is officially cited as 2026 NY Slip Op 05536 and involves Ramon A. Marcano as respondent and Daysis O. Suazo as appellant.
• The decision was published by the New York State Law Reporting Bureau under Judiciary Law § 431.
• This slip opinion is currently uncorrected and subject to revision before its final publication.
• The ruling contributes new New York case law, identified by docket numbers 2025-10091 and V-12196-25.

The emergence of a new appellate decision, such as Marcano v. Suazo 2026 NY Slip Op 05536, holds considerable importance for the legal community, particularly for those engaged in the study and practice of New York law.

On September 30, 2026, the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department, formally issued a new decision in a case identified as In the Matter of Ramon A. Marcano, respondent, v Daysis O. Suazo, appellant. This specific ruling has been assigned the official citation 2026 NY Slip Op 05536, marking its entry into the public record of New York case law. The parties involved in this appellate proceeding are Ramon A. Marcano, who holds the position of respondent, and Daysis O. Suazo, who is the appellant in the matter.

Further identifying details for this judicial action include the docket numbers 2025-10091 and V-12196-25. These numbers are critical for pinpointing the exact case within the court's extensive filing system and for tracking its procedural history. The decision's publication on this date by the New York Appellate Division Second Department signifies a completed stage in the legal dispute between Marcano and Suazo, with the court having rendered its judgment on the issues presented during the appeal.

The New York Appellate Division, Second Department, serves as a pivotal intermediate appellate court within the state's judicial hierarchy, reviewing decisions from trial courts across a broad geographical jurisdiction. Its rulings are instrumental in shaping and clarifying New York case law, setting binding precedents for lower courts and offering guidance to legal professionals. The formal publication of the Marcano v. Suazo 2026 NY Slip Op 05536 decision is carried out by the New York State Law Reporting Bureau, a process mandated by Judiciary Law § 431, which ensures the systematic and official dissemination of judicial opinions.

A significant detail accompanying this particular decision is its status as an "uncorrected" slip opinion. This designation indicates that while the court has issued its ruling, the text remains subject to potential revisions before its ultimate inclusion in the Official Reports. Such revisions are typically administrative, addressing minor errors in grammar, spelling, or formatting, but they can occasionally encompass more substantive clarifications. Therefore, legal practitioners referencing this decision must be aware that the final, authoritative version may differ slightly from the initial slip opinion.

The emergence of a new appellate decision, such as Marcano v. Suazo 2026 NY Slip Op 05536, holds considerable importance for the legal community, particularly for those engaged in the study and practice of New York law. This citation confirms that the New York Appellate Division Second Department has rendered a judgment in a specific legal dispute involving Ramon A. Marcano and Daysis O. Suazo, thereby contributing a new data point to the state's evolving legal framework. Even without the immediate availability of the full opinion text, the existence of this ruling signals a development that could influence future legal interpretations and applications.

For lawyers, judges, and legal scholars, new New York case law from an appellate court provides fresh insights into how legal principles are applied to specific factual scenarios. The inclusion of the docket number, V-12196-25, further aids in contextualizing the decision by linking it to its original proceeding. As the complete and finalized opinion becomes accessible, this ruling will undoubtedly serve as a reference point, potentially impacting the resolution of similar cases and contributing to the broader understanding of legal standards within New York.

This article provides a citation for a recent New York Appellate Division decision. Without the full opinion text, there is no immediate practical implication for lawyers or compliance officers beyond noting its existence for potential future reference or research.

Source: Original reporting via New York State Law Reporting Bureau