Florida 4DCA: Manisha Maraj v State of Florida 4D2025-1176 Appeal Filed

• Manisha Maraj, as the appellant, has brought an appeal against the State of Florida. Manisha Maraj is currently suspended and not eligible to practice law in Florida.
• The case, identified as No. 4D2025-1176, was recorded by the Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal on October 15, 2026.
• The appeal originated from a decision made in the County Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County.
• Judge Caroline C. Shepherd presided over the initial proceedings in the lower court; she now serves as a judge on the Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal.
• Without the full opinion, the specific legal issues or outcome of this Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal case are not publicly known.

Without access to the full judicial opinion or order issued by the Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal, the specific legal implications or precedential value of this particular appellate case remain entirely unknown.

A new appellate proceeding, identified as Manisha Maraj v. State of Florida, has been formally recorded by the District Court of Appeal of the State of Florida, Fourth District. This case, bearing the number 4D2025-1176, lists Manisha Maraj as the appellant. Manisha Maraj is currently suspended and not eligible to practice law in Florida, challenging a prior decision, with the State of Florida named as the appellee. The official date associated with this appellate action is October 15, 2026, marking its entry into the public record of Florida's higher courts.

The appeal originates from a judgment rendered in the County Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, which encompasses Palm Beach County. The specific lower court proceedings were overseen by Judge Caroline C. Shepherd, who now serves as a judge on the Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal. While the existence of this Manisha Maraj Florida appeal is now confirmed, the details surrounding the specific legal issues or the substantive outcome of the appeal itself are not disclosed in the initial public record, which primarily serves to document the case's filing and parties involved.

The Florida judicial system is structured with district courts of appeal serving as the intermediate appellate tier, reviewing decisions from circuit and county courts. The Fourth District Court of Appeal, where the Manisha Maraj v. State of Florida case is lodged, holds jurisdiction over several counties, including Palm Beach County, from which this particular appeal arises. This means that a party dissatisfied with a ruling in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit's County Court, as Manisha Maraj apparently was, has the right to seek a review of that decision by a panel of appellate judges in the Fourth District.

Appeals to these district courts typically involve a review of the lower court's application of law, procedural correctness, and whether the evidence supported the verdict or judgment. The case number 4D2025-1176 indicates its specific designation within the Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal case docket, with the '4D' signifying the Fourth District and '2025' likely referring to the year the appeal was initiated or assigned its primary identifier, culminating in a decision or formal entry in October 2026. This process is a fundamental aspect of ensuring due process and legal consistency across the state's various judicial circuits.

The recording of Manisha Maraj v. State of Florida, No. 4D2025-1176, on October 15, 2026, adds to the growing body of Florida case law for that period. However, without access to the full judicial opinion or order issued by the Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal, the specific legal implications or precedential value of this particular appellate case remain entirely unknown. The public record, in this instance, confirms only the procedural fact of an appeal being heard and decided, rather than providing insight into the legal reasoning, the issues contested, or the final disposition of the appellant's challenge.

Consequently, while the case is now a part of the official judicial history originating from the Palm Beach County Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, its broader impact on future legal interpretations or its contribution to specific areas of law cannot be assessed. This highlights a common limitation when only basic case citation information is available; the true 'why it matters' for legal practitioners and the public hinges on the detailed rationale articulated in the court's full written decision, which is not provided in this initial record. It serves primarily as an entry in the ongoing chronicle of appellate review in Florida.

This article provides only the case citation and parties for a Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal decision. Without the full opinion text, there is no actionable legal implication or specific precedent to track beyond noting the existence of this particular appellate case.

Source: Original reporting via Florida court records