Illinois First District: Taris Real Estate LLC v Berish 2026 IL Order Non-Precedential

• The Illinois First District Appellate Court issued an order in Taris Real Estate, LLC v. Berish on September 10, 2026.
• This order is identified by the citation 2026 IL App (1st) 241824-U and order number No. 1-24-1824.
• The decision was filed under Illinois Supreme Court Rule 23, meaning it is generally not considered precedent.
• It cannot be cited as binding authority except in limited circumstances allowed by Rule 23(e)(1).
• The Fourth Division of the Illinois First District Appellate Court handled this non-precedential Illinois order.

For lawyers navigating the Illinois legal landscape, the non-precedential nature of the Taris Real Estate LLC v Berish 2026 IL order is a critical consideration.

The Illinois First District Appellate Court, specifically its Fourth Division, recently issued an order in the case of Taris Real Estate, LLC v. Berish. This judicial action, identified by the citation 2026 IL App (1st) 241824-U and order number No. 1-24-1824, was filed on September 10, 2026. While resolving the specific dispute between the named parties, the court explicitly noted that this particular order was filed under the provisions of Illinois Supreme Court Rule 23. This designation carries significant weight regarding its future applicability and influence within the state's legal framework.

The issuance of this order by the Illinois First District Appellate Court signifies a resolution to the immediate legal matter involving Taris Real Estate, LLC and Berish. However, the crucial aspect for legal practitioners and scholars alike is its classification under Rule 23. This rule governs the publication and precedential value of appellate court decisions in Illinois, distinguishing between those that establish binding law and those that serve a more limited purpose. Understanding this distinction is paramount when assessing the impact of decisions like the one in Taris Real Estate LLC v Berish 2026 IL.

Under Illinois Supreme Court Rule 23, an order designated as such is generally not considered precedent. This means that, with very specific exceptions, it cannot be cited by parties or relied upon by courts as binding authority in subsequent cases. The rule is designed to manage the vast volume of appellate cases, allowing courts to efficiently resolve disputes that do not present novel legal questions, establish new principles of law, or warrant publication as binding precedent. Consequently, the 2026 IL App (1st) 241824-U order, while a definitive ruling for the parties involved, does not contribute to the body of binding case law that shapes future legal interpretations.

The limited circumstances under which a non-precedential Illinois order may be cited are narrowly defined by Rule 23(e)(1). These exceptions typically include situations where the order is relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case, or to demonstrate a claim for sanctions. Outside of these specific scenarios, the Taris Real Estate v Berish decision, like other non-precedential orders, is intended to address the specific facts and legal arguments presented by the litigants without creating broader legal implications. This framework ensures that only decisions with significant jurisprudential value become part of the state's binding legal canon.

For lawyers navigating the Illinois legal landscape, the non-precedential nature of the Taris Real Estate LLC v Berish 2026 IL order is a critical consideration. It underscores that while the Illinois First District Appellate Court has rendered a decision, this ruling does not establish a legal standard that other courts are obligated to follow. Practitioners should therefore exercise caution when encountering such orders, understanding that while their use as binding precedent is almost entirely precluded by Illinois Supreme Court Rule 23, orders issued on or after January 1, 2021, may be cited for persuasive purposes. The decision in Taris Real Estate, LLC v. Berish, identified as 2026 IL App (1st) 241824-U, thus primarily serves to conclude the specific litigation between the parties, rather than to inform or direct the outcome of unrelated future cases.

Lawyers should note that this Illinois Appellate Court order is non-precedential under Supreme Court Rule 23, meaning it generally cannot be cited as binding authority in future cases, limiting its utility as a legal precedent.

Source: Original reporting via court filing