Ghana High Court Judges: Thaddeus Sory Warns Against Media Challenges

• Private legal practitioner Thaddeus Sory has urged lawyers to exercise caution when engaging with sensitive judicial issues through public commentary.
• Mr. Sory cautions against challenging judicial decisions through public campaigns, arguing that it can lead to inflaming public sentiment and undermining the integrity of the judicial process.
• He encourages lawyers to engage with the Chief Justice directly and present their objections in a constructive manner.
• Mr. Sory also urges lawyers to exercise restraint when dealing with sensitive matters, particularly when it comes to allegations of political interference or bias.

The judge is going to write the ruling. You can challenge it.

The recent controversy surrounding Chief Justice Paul Baffoe-Bonnie's directive allowing selected High Court judges to sit during the legal vacation has sparked a heated debate among lawyers. Private legal practitioner Thaddeus Sory has weighed in on the matter, urging lawyers to exercise caution when engaging with sensitive judicial issues through public commentary. According to Mr. Sory, such actions can escalate tensions without resolving the underlying disputes. He emphasizes that disagreements with judicial decisions should be addressed through established legal procedures and channels. By doing so, lawyers can ensure that their concerns are heard and addressed in a constructive manner.

Mr. Sory's comments come at a time when some lawyers have chosen to challenge judicial decisions through public campaigns rather than pursuing established legal procedures. He cautions against this approach, arguing that it can lead to inflaming public sentiment and undermining the integrity of the judicial process. Instead, he encourages lawyers to engage with the Chief Justice directly and present their objections in a constructive manner. This approach not only ensures that concerns are heard but also helps to maintain the rule of law and the independence of the judiciary.

The controversy surrounding the Chief Justice's directive has also raised questions about the role of lawyers in challenging judicial decisions. Mr. Sory urges lawyers to exercise restraint when dealing with sensitive matters, particularly when it comes to allegations of political interference or bias. He emphasizes that such claims should be made only after exhausting all available legal remedies and engaging with the relevant authorities. By doing so, lawyers can maintain their professional integrity and avoid undermining the credibility of the judicial process.

Lawyers should be cautious of public commentary on sensitive matters, as it can escalate tensions without resolving the issues at stake, and instead engage with the Chief Justice directly to discuss their objections.

Source: Original reporting via myjoyonline.com